Anonymous ID: edf42f Aug. 5, 2022, 1:31 a.m. No.17060783   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://news.yahoo.com/wisconsin-election-investigator-fined-2k-164950744.html

https://archive.ph/A8j8E

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A judge on Wednesday issued a scathing ruling against the investigator hired by Republicans to look into the 2020 election in Wisconsin, accusing him of unprofessional and misogynistic conduct, forwarding his decision for possible disciplinary action against Michael Gableman.

Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington ordered that Gableman be fined $2,000 a day until he complies with his earlier ruling. He also determined that Gableman violated his oath as an attorney following his “disruptive and disrespectful” appearance in court last week. At that hearing, Remington found a defiant Gableman to be in contempt after he refused to answer questions under subpoena in the courtroom. His attorneys tried unsuccessfully to block the subpoena.

“Wisconsin demands more from its attorneys,” Remginton wrote. “Gableman’s demeaning conduct has discredited the profession and every other person sworn ’to commit themselves to live by the constitutional processes of our system.”

The order comes in an open records lawsuit filed by liberal government watchdog group American Oversight. It is one of three open records lawsuits the group filed against Gableman, Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and the state Assembly. The group has won a series of victories before Remington and another Dane County judge after Gableman and Vos failed to produce the requested records in a timely manner.

Gableman's attorneys did not immediately return messages seeking comment on the judge's order.

Remington chided Gableman for what he called his “unprofessional conduct” and for launching into “an irrelevant diatribe” at last week's hearing. Remington forwarded the order to the office that hands down disciplinary actions against attorneys and judges in Wisconsin. Gableman could face additional sanctions that include suspension or revocation of his license to practice law.

Anonymous ID: edf42f Aug. 5, 2022, 1:36 a.m. No.17061366   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17061289

Discussion Starter · #1 · Dec 28, 2011

I'm just in a real anti anti-gun mood today….. I was in another non-gun forum and there was a post about anti-gun celebrities and then I thought for a moment…Almost every single person on this list is protected by armed security, whether at the place they work (film sets, sports venues, TV/radio/music media studios) or an armed bodyguard whenever they are in public during their private time. This list does not even have all the anti gun mayors, governors and political types who are protected by armed guards.

 

I just don't get it, how can they be anti-gun and there is a Glock nearby. Sorry for my rant but try to get within arms length of the following anti's and see how fast the full metal jackets fly at you:

https://www.georgiapacking.org/threads/rant-anti-gun-celebrities-all-have-armed-bodyguards.233999/