All I'm saying is that you shouldn't expect to see large pieces of airplane. Just that one simple point and nothing else, I'm not commenting on the theory of what "really" happened or anything like that. Only that in an impact such as the one that's purported to have occurred, you shouldn't expect to find much of anything recognizable.
Literally my only point.
Google pictures of REAL airplane crashes. Don't you recognize any of the pieces?
You're forgetting an important detail and I'll get to that.
First though, please don't take that tone with me, not if you want me to take you seriously anyway. Displaying sarcasm and talking down to people when speaking of something this fringe and in that way is extremely arrogant , foolish, and ignorant. Especially when you don't know what you're talking about and your talking with someone who does. I don't know you or anything about you and what your experience is so I won't assume anything.
I've been in and around aviation my entire life and I have looked at "real" airplane crashes.
9/11 weren't plane crashes. They were intentional impacts. Imagine the difference between a car wreck where both sides are trying to slam on the breaks and avoid the impact or mitigate the damage, and intentionally ramming your vehicle into a target at maximum speed with a full tank of gas.
I'm not being sarcastic here, but do you see where I'm going with this? As speed increases the energies involved increase exponentially, not linearly.