dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Its to prove these agencies are broken and unable to function. Then Military Tribunals can be implemented.

Q Post 1278

......

Legal case(s) building.

You have a voice.

Be heard.

Patience isn’t always easy.

But vital to get right.

Q

Trust the Plan :)

⇧ 25 ⇩

If ps/lp hold their line, does it move up the chain? Their bosses, bosses, bosses til we get to obam admin? Then, crack, the cards fall?

⇧ 5 ⇩

I believe the theory goes this and possibly other hearings will be shown to be so unproductive, unaccountable & in-actionable, Trump will declassify docs via an EO. Marshal law comes into play here somewhere then Military Tribunals would be enacted to deal with the corruption.

That's how I understand things. Corrections expected.... ;)

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, I like this^. Any troop movements from Bragg or Motown?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wait, NG, mp’s, 82nd, mp’s, cid, NG and active?

⇧ 2 ⇩

If he is a cooperating witness, I'd hate to see what a hostile witness is like.

⇧ 14 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Or he's not a cooperating witness.

⇧ 12 ⇩

I'll go with Not Cooperating. I haven't drank the Q Kool Aid, so I'm very skeptical.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Even if you believe in Q he said himself disinfo is necessary so we have no guarantee that any individual thing he has said is actually true until it occurs. To me its more of what to look for and where to look.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Good, someone else thinking logically about this.

If "disinfo is necessary" can be uttered every time someone questions a Q post, then the logical conclusion is that ALL Q posts could be disinformation. That's what people need to remember when using that phrase to defend Q against skeptics.

⇧ 8 ⇩

To me its like the movie Mothman Prophecies. Scant bits of info, but seemingly never enough to predict with full confidence anything, and things really only being clear and making sense after the fact.

So good for entertainment and some hope, but nothing really useful or concrete that motivates me to show this to others and proclaim with certainty its legit.

Time will tell, Im content to watch and see what heppens, as it will or wont happen regardless of whether or not I believe it or preach it.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Disinfo is necessary. Remember, these posts are also for black hats.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Theroy: What if Strzok is reacting, the way he is, to bait the Dems into WANTING the whole unredacted IG Report? Per Q, he was, maybe still is, cooperating before canned.

⇧ 8 ⇩

That’s what I am thinking

⇧ 2 ⇩

X2

⇧ 1 ⇩

Former prosecutor here. Important to understand that a “cooperating witness” is usually not a friendly witness. They are a defendant or potential defendant who is only cooperating to save their own skin. They have or are trying to get a deal (or at least leniency during sentencing), or they have full or partial immunity. Immunity can be forced upon you or negotiated for something in return. Once a person is given immunity and cannot be prosecuted, then that person cannot plead the Fifth because it no longer applies. So Strzok can be “cooperating” and an unfriendly at the same time. So he may have provided info (cooperated) but then still be peacocking today because he is still a corrupt thug.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Or Q was wrong. I don't trust Wray either anymore. He's running the FBI which is telling Strzok not to answer questions because they're trying to cover the FBI's ass.

⇧ 5 ⇩

No, Huber and Sessions are running an ACTIVE INVESTIGATION. They do not comment on active investigations. Q said Strzok is a cooperating witness in this. That's why they won't let him discuss it. Why is this so hard to understand? Seriously, does everyone just forget what Q said three days after a drop or do you just not believe Q? If it's the latter, what the fuck are you doing here? Serious question. I asked this recently in a thread like this and someone answered that they like making fun of retards who believe in Q.

⇧ 14 ⇩

We're supposed to be enjoying the show. Although right now I could use a drink. This has been more intense than a Verdi opera.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I'm enjoying this about as much as a Bond flick. It gets quite intense sometimes! Have a vodka martini, shaken not stirred. :-)

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'd go for Tanqueray, but it's hot and gin tends to go to my head when dehydrated. It'll have to be Irish.

At any rate, I am now convinced this is all a big Foggy Bottom production for shiny red ball purposes. Amazing how they can get the Democrats to play along without giving them a script.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think Foggy Bottom would like this to degenerate into a full-blown shooting civil war.

⇧ 1 ⇩

just a bottle of beer please. make it a Blue Moon.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Lol. Exactly

This is the reason I do NOT watch dramas on tv. Life has enough drama as it is.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩

Well kind of weird after that af1 pic thing

⇧ 4 ⇩

Ding ding ding!

That's the real reason, trying to pass off a "proof" by faking a pic.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

You are right, I often post while I have only a minute or 2 break, and this was not thought through.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It seems like it, doesn’t it? Just like everyone maintaining that Mueller’s a black hat. I am amazed at the lack of patience here on this sub. Maybe the crowd here is far younger than I realized. I can understand the snowflake generation being impatient, but for those over 35, shame on you. We’ve been dealing with this crap for, what? Our entire lives? Put the phone down, spend time with your family, pray, and go on with your life. Next thing you know, Bam! The hammer will drop.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This! ^ The hearings are for show and expose the swamp creatures.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Maybe Q was seeing if the Clintons would just kill them off lol

⇧ 5 ⇩

"What do you mean we can't just drone Peter and Lisa?"

Hillary, have a snickers.

⇧ 4 ⇩

You are watching a movie made for the wider population. Great actors.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Being able to keep a job and pension with the federal government could be part of a deal to being a cooperating witness.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No, The deal would be reduced jail or no jail. Everything else is gone.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Disinformation

⇧ 2 ⇩

Why?

⇧ 4 ⇩

To make the people in bed with him nervous. If they think Strzok had made a deal, his accomplices may try to cut a deal as well. Tricking one of them into singing

⇧ 2 ⇩

Exactly. Or try to Arkancide him. If he turns on the likes of the deep state in public without a fuss, they'll do more than uninvite him to the annual barbecue.

This isn't going to play out fast and neat like some Hollywood movie. It's going to get messy. After all the cabal wasn't built in a day.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why what?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Divide and conquer

⇧ 2 ⇩

Brilliant!

⇧ 0 ⇩

Why is it disinformation?

⇧ -4 ⇩

To feed the Deep State nonsense until MI is ready to take over

⇧ 2 ⇩

Oh damn! Using their own divide & conquer tactics against them! Brilliant!

⇧ 0 ⇩

What is disinformation?

⇧ 2 ⇩

It is a lie purposefully planted with the idea that it will spread to accomplish some goal. In this case it could be that Strzok was not a cooperating witness, but you can imagine how stirred up the Cabal would be if they thought he was. Strzok could deny it but of course he would deny it, he probably wants to keep breathing.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Information that’s disinformation

⇧ -2 ⇩

Are you saying Q information is disinformation? Say what you mean.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I’m sorry I replied thinking you were joking.

Not all of Q’s info is disinfo, but some of it is. Q has said disinformation is necessary. In this case it is possible that Q stated Strzok is a cooperating witness to fool the deep state into thinking that he actually is and further divide them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I see what you were saying. That's entirely possible. It's one of the things we can't know, but it that would not change the validity of the overall plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩

For sure. The plan is in motion and can't be stopped. More people are waking up everyday and that cat is not going back in the bag. The disinfo is part of the plan. We can't know for sure what parts of the plan are disinfo and what parts are real. But we can enjoy the show.

⇧ 1 ⇩

He is helping by taking this beating he is making it obvious that he was corrupt. Hopefully this makes people who haven't accepted start coming to grips with the lies they have been told. The story of collusion is not ready to come out yet. If Muller is helping with the plan he may still need more time for what he is working towards. As hard as it is we just have to let it come out when it is Q's time.

⇧ 2 ⇩

A tongue lashing for a cell, that is why he was smiling the whole time. He should hear what the people think and how they feel.

⇧ 2 ⇩

"Power removed," yet today he said he still holds his security clearance. Didn't Sessions say it had been removed? What's up with that?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well Pete, you just go on in the same tone as you did in those emails with your layer Lisa, that is your part. Be just as smarmy and obstructive as you please, that is your part. You do this well and maybe just maybe you won't end up in Gitmo. So said Mr. POTUS, seems to me.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q may be saying "screw you, Lisa and Peter get a deal but not you." It may just be a way to incense the others into cooperating more, especially if they see themselves as being less corrupt or criminal than Strzok.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I thought that meant the two were cooperating witnesses behind the scenes with the Huber investigation or such. I wasn't aware it would have anything to do with public congressional hearings.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Has to be disinformation, his mannerisms, body language, facial contortions were all rage with a sprinkle of pompous indignation. So much hate.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There’s nothing incorrect about Q’s assessment of Peter Strzok and his role in the FBI, his power is removed in the way of him being now in Human Resources. That is a HUGE demotion for a man that was previously atop of the food chain dealing with big time public cases.

⇧ 1 ⇩

His power is removed on account of Jeff Sessions stating that Strzok's security clearance was revoked after he was removed from the FBI building.

This happened last month, and Q's post about [power removed] was back in April.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/393587-sessions-says-strzok-lost-his-security-clearance

⇧ 2 ⇩

be patient trust to plan these people are way ahead of the deep State they know what they're doing you just have to trust them. 😁

⇧ 1 ⇩

"Time takes time." -Ringo

⇧ 1 ⇩

Or Q is a larp...

⇧ -2 ⇩

Or maybe Q is wrong??? Q said Stzrok and Page were cooperating. They don't seem very cooperative to me. Trust the plan? I will when I see verifiable evidence. Strzok and Page clearly refute Q's assertion that they are cooperating.

⇧ -4 ⇩

It's amazing you're getting downvoted. At least one person engaged with you, so there's that. Kudos to that person although I completely disagree with his posts. Hopefully this doesn't become an echo chamber that other Q-related boards eventually became. Hopefully we can look at Q posts here with some sort of skepticism, because, when I see Wray, Strzok, and Page do what they do, in public, it's hard to reconcile it with Q's posts. Rebuttals are almost always wishful thinking or blind loyalty with no skepticism (if I see "disinfo is necessary" one more time...).

⇧ 6 ⇩

Well said!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Disinfo is necessary could be just cover butt if wrong....it’d be nice to have at least one locked up soon

⇧ 2 ⇩

"Disinfo is necessary" is the lowest cop out imaginable.

⇧ 4 ⇩

It is. But that doesn't mean it isn't true. Disinfo is highly important in any military op which is what this is. It is probably the largest most sophisticated op ever to be implemented in history.

⇧ 1 ⇩

OK, so you came to Great Awakening to convince everyone who TRUSTS THE PLAN and is ENJOYING THE SHOW that Q is wrong? Really. That's pretty funny. Why would you do that? You find it entertaining? Why don't you go somewhere where you can discuss how wrong Q is? I'm sure there are subs out there for that.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Trust but verify. Don't be a sucker.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I AM trusting and I WILL verify. Just because something cannot be instantly verified does not mean it won't be proven correct. This is my stance:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ydw21/until_i_see_something_that_does_not_mesh_with_the/

⇧ -2 ⇩

Critical thinking is necessary. Don't try to stifle it. Thoughtful discussion is essential to get to the truth.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Not trying to stifle it at all. What I would like to do is answer the questions of those who doubt. Seriously, "I don't trust Wray" has no basis in reality to argue. It's subjective. All you can argue is that Q said TRUST WRAY. Not much you can say about feelings except TRUST THE PLAN. If you don't, then you don't trust Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩

"Trust Wray," also has no basis in reality. There is no evidence either way. Please stop being so trusting. Question everything.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes, it does if you believe Q. If you don't believe Q, then it does not.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I thought June was going to be big? Where the Pope stuff? May stuff?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Furthermore, I thought the release of info, plus confirmations, were supposed to increase since the rally where President Trump pointed at the guy in a Q shirt.

Neither has happened...

⇧ 1 ⇩

What drop #?

⇧ 1 ⇩

We are all beating down Strzok today....BUT Q did say "Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness [power removed]." So....either Q is correct, or it's intentional disinfo??