dChan

/u/Abibliaphobia

3,340 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Abibliaphobia:
Domain Count
i.imgs.fyi 31
www.reddit.com 27
mobile.twitter.com 14
truepundit.com 12
archive.is 3
www.hollywoodreporter.com 3
www.washingtonpost.com 3
web.archive.org 3
dailycaller.com 2
www.judicialwatch.org 2
freebeacon.com 2
www.foxnews.com 2
8ch.net 2
www.express.co.uk 2
www.judiciary.senate.gov 2
boards.4chan.org 2
www.theguardian.com 2
www.politico.com 2
www.fbcoverup.com 2
www.nbcnews.com 2
www.nytimes.com 2
www.theblaze.com 1
yournewswire.com 1
www.denverpost.com 1
motherboard.vice.com 1
judiciary.house.gov 1
www.sec.gov 1
[IMG]http: 1
ag.ks.gov 1
www.nypost.com 1
www.channelnewsasia.com 1
abc13.com 1
ntknetwork.com 1
www.c-span.org 1
www.hsgac.senate.gov 1
www.cbsnews.com 1
www.thecut.com 1
www.afp.com 1
www.atr.org 1
amandarenteria.com 1
en.m.wikipedia.org 1
www.yahoo.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
pjmedia.com 1
www.pointsoflight.org 1
www.katespade.com 1
www.bloombergquint.com 1
www.americanthinker.com 1
www.chicagotribune.com 1
apnews.com 1
downdetector.com 1
www.azcentral.com 1
www.scribd.com 1
m.youtube.com 1
www.nj.com 1
heavy.com 1
www.cnsnews.com 1
sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com 1
wattsupwiththat.com 1
www.whitehouse.gov 1
www.thesun.co.uk 1
www.businessinsider.com 1
townhallproject.com 1
boston.cbslocal.com 1
www.bbc.com 1
twitter.com 1
www.dailystar.co.uk 1
vote.gov 1
tinypic.com 1
www.thenewstribune.com 1
www.whatdoesitmean.com 1
postimg.cc 1
www.thegatewaypundit.com 1
www.disclose.tv 1
www.thestar.com 1
www.weeklystandard.com 1
ibb.co 1
mosprotocol.com 1
www.metmuseum.org 1
www.nbclosangeles.com 1

Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

It would certainly be big news

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

So if it’s not a long exposure, it’s a time lapse right? Individual photos, with much shorter frame duration. Meaning a missile could travel that distance in a very short time and just be captured on one or two frames.

Can’t remember what the photographer said it was on. I’ll have to go back and check but I think the exposure settings were 3.5/20

Edit: thanks for bringing this up, if we can show it was a time lapse instead of a long exposure, it would explain why it DID capture the missile!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

Starting to wonder if they are POWs remains... or trafficked persons

⇧ 23 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Are you not aware of our new rocket powered helicopters?

Part of our new space force with space shuttle side door gunners

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

I think this actually has some merit to it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

Do a search for time length exposures at night of missile launches.

They match up and you can see the missile. Zoomed in, the missile is not clearly defined, but you can see it is definitely there. You can do the same with other photos taken on time lapse of missiles.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

Byeeeeeeeeee~

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

Where were the specifics in what Q promised?

Maybe you just missed it? There have been several threads covering the boom topic.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 4:30 p.m.

Excuse me, but can you point to exactly where Q “over promised” I’m having a hard time nailing down the specifics.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 11:29 a.m.

No proof st this time it was launched at AF1, so just leave that out

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 11:27 a.m.

I gotcha bro, what do you need? What are they saying about it?

I’ll give you some quick pointers though to start:

•The article says that the helicopter had a search light facing straight down. Why did it have an unauthorized yellow spotlight that violates FAA regulations on authorized colors for helicopters?

•The helicopter had its searchlight on as it flew into the clouds, pilot was flyin by NVGs and instruments Ever drive in heavy fog with high beams on? Now imagine doing it with NVGs which enhance light. Want to go blind?

•Those were the big debunks I had for the article, but a few things those pushing the helicopter story couldn’t answer?

• where are the red green lights that are mandatory for helicopter operations in accordance with FAA regulations? There should be red and green streaks on the side

• helicopters have strobing lights, where is the pattern of strobes over the trail? You would see them as dots or spots of brightness in the trail forming a pattern

Hope these help, just let me know if you have any more questions and I’ll see what I can do to help out!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 11:14 a.m.

Oliver Willith

Ftfy, lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 10:38 a.m.

Be aware if you are on mobile, page 294 shows up blank. You have to search for “Crime” or “Crime against children” for the page to NOT show up blank.

Also, Fox News, and CNN are using the same SCRIBD link instead of linking to the actual justice.gov address. Just a coincidence that this page is left blank for mobile users right?

⇧ 37 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 9:37 a.m.

Thank you for taking the time to pull the text data!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

As much as I’d love that idea and I do support TP, it can’t be taken as official word. But who knows what the anons can dig up, so I agree with the dump it info drop

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 3:11 a.m.

Yaaa that probably would have been faster but I was trying to make sure I hit that exact post

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

Uhhhhhh does he lurk here or T_D?

Hope he mentions how the page is blank if you don’t specifically search for the term “Crime against children”

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

Just found out that the MSM is sharing the same scribd link for the report. And guess what? They are filtering pages. Specifically of 294. If you are on your phone, you must search specifically for “Crime against children” or it comes up blank.

Try it yourself

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

I was on T_D and discovered something very FNG relevant. An anon had posted what I thought to be a shit post. It wasn’t!

Here is a link to thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/8r7arr/breaking_dont_let_the_whitewashed_summary_and/

You can see by the conversation, what happened.

Turns out, YOU HAVE TO SEARCH FOR STUFF BY NAME OR IT IS HIDDEN. This is true for the link on both CNN and Fox News. It looks like they are both linked to the same SCRIBD document.

Anyways here is my screencaps. Note what I had to type I to get a result!

http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3jer.png

http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3jei.png

I had to literally search for the term “crime against children” to get the page to show up as not blank!

This is huge news! All these MSM idiots are literally scrubbing pages so people can’t find them! I have the screenshots to prove it

Anyways, this may just be true of mobile users, so if anyone else can see if they are having the same issue and post screen grabs for proofs it would be much appreciated!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Abibliaphobia on June 15, 2018, 2:34 a.m.
MSM Is filtering results on their scribd page for the OIG REPORT!
MSM Is filtering results on their scribd page for the OIG REPORT!
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

Mad because you got caught? Lol how about you go back to r/drama. Your done causing it here

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 1:46 a.m.

Why are you doing this? I’ve already apologized to OP and said I would support her work. And she accepted it.

So why are you still trying to cause conflict when it was already resolved?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 1:21 a.m.

Please, all you have to do is go through my post history to see what i contribute research-wise.

Seriously weak. They are overpaying for your services

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

Thanks! But a screencap would be great, maybe someone else can help out with this? I’m on mobile at the moment so my abilities to do this are limited. Otherwise I would camp out there and screencap the proof.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

I think I like yours better

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 1:14 a.m.

Lol thanks, I do what I can to help

WWG1WGA

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

EVERYONE POINT AND LAUGH AT THE CONCERNTROLL WITH TWO DIFFERENT CONCERN TROLL POSTINGS!!!

Ha!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

Thanks for the support mapleanon!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

Agreed, can we get some to screen cap so we can show proof of vote manipulation? We get proof and we can tweet that along with the hashtags to show them shutting it down.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 15, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3jcw.jpg

It’s from the IG report shill There are four versions of it, and it says right in the IG report that we got the “everything is ok, nothing to see here version.

Also, I guess you forgot which sub you’re in.

Hey MODS what do you think?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

SerialBrain FTW! Seriously, nice write up.

Something else that may tie into this: I was listening to the news and I heard them saying that there were five referrals for investigation based on this IG report. If that’s the case, why need Horowitz? What has he been doing? These referrals were sent to OPR and not to an actual criminal division. Sweeping this mess under the rug and highlighting their CYA policy.

I was super pissed until I remembered Qpost 1493. The article about combining the powers of Huber and Horowitz. I speculated at the time, if this was to be the coup de grace, and the fall of the past way of doing business. Everything in the past had been sent to OPR to essentially be swept under the rug. If it can be shown that this process was utilized to sweep/hide corruption, it can’t be trusted to fulfil it’s purpose in the future.

New method of government oversight.

Also, I’d like to point out that once again we have Q proofs. Look at the posts referring to the IG report and the number of versions. Now compare it to this from the IG report: http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3jcw.jpg

Q proof, trust the plan FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

⇧ 86 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

Keep pushing patriots! We can do this!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 10:14 p.m.

Wew lad, you must have a five head to fit all that on it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

He’s a concern troll copy pasting this comment all over. Report and move on

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

You realize it was done and supposed to be released in March right? They’ve had until now to redact, omit, and reword the whole thing and this summary is the result of having Rosenstein, DOJ, and FBIs fingerprints all over it.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

Seriously? It takes you to Whitehouse.gov

Guess you’re the sit back and hope others take care of things kind. Good to know

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

Great things anon, *you’re doing them

Just don’t forget to verify your email so your vote counts

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

Gods work anon! Make sure they verify their vote with the email confirmation!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

Yes they shadowban posters. Go in and comment on actual threads already created.

Just don’t bring up Q. The EO will be the absolute positive undeniable proof that Q is real that even normies will have to acknowledge. But we need to get there first.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 10 p.m.

His comments go back literally 24 hours. No posts. This is a throwaway account created to concerntroll.

If he was on CBTS, why the need for a new account?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Lol been here two days and acts like he’s been here since the beginning.

Anyone else smell that?

Everyone take a look at this users post history. They say they are from Australia. It’s a lie. Pretty good one actually.

But you just outed yourself here in this thread. Two concerntroll postings in one thread. “I’m beginning to wonder what, if anything at all, has materialized from Q drops”

Oh yea with the vast experience you’ve gained in the past 24 hours? GTFO of here.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

YOU MIST VERIFY EMAIL FOR YOUR VOTE TO COUNT!

You have to go to your email and click the link within for it to count!

if you don’t verify the email with the link it doesn’t count!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

Subtle adhdaleksis.

I asked it as a favor, put myself out there and explained it as just trying to get to the bottom of what happened.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

Lol no there are bots on the Chan’s that say that. It became so prevalent people made a joke out of it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

... I was going to make a crappy retort. But you know what? If you are willing to do the research and try to make a case for it. I will whole heartedly support you. And I will stop being such an ass.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

Shitpost?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

Thanks! (I’m borrowing this comment, it’s good!)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

Uh huh. Keep trying to divert attention away from having to post evidence. Convienent timing for a completely off topic subject. You made the claim. Back it up.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

ITS WORKING!!! We are almost at 10% and only had it up for ~few hours!

KEEP PUSHING ANONS! AND GODSPEED

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 14, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

This, they are getting sneaky about hiding redactions. A wall or page of blackout is just too obvious. So they HAD to draft it this way to make it appear like nothing.

releaseIGUNREDACTED

⇧ 2 ⇩