Anonymous ID: 6493c4 March 25, 2024, 8:38 a.m. No.20623660   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3682

>>20623525 (pb)

>So Jewish people trying to make it look like Goyim are making fun of Jews?

Intimidation tactic. People are waking up to the supremacist views of Judaism. Remember, their religious views teach that they're the "Chosen Ones" (tm), by "divine right" and us "Goyim" (tm) "animals in human form meant to serve the Jews." The reply you received from another Anon, where he provided Loomer's hidden agenda only showcases their supremacist views. "Globalist" and "Zionist" are actually interchangeable. They're one and the same and have the same end goal: One world government under Jewish control. They're losing the information war. That's why we saw what happened between Candace and Shapiro (that was all for show anyway) and why Loomer is now kvetching about muh "Globalists aren't muh Zionists" (tm) narrative. In the months to come, Loomer is going to start seriously showing her true colors as more and more people discover we are, indeed, oppressed by Jewish rule. Loomer was never "MAGA" or "America First." She's always been Israel/Jewish First.

 

That's why Loomer is allowed to throw around "White Supremacy" (tm) symbols and not get canceled for it. She's Sayanim, just like Shapiro and always has been.

Anonymous ID: 6493c4 March 25, 2024, 8:56 a.m. No.20623743   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3802

>>20623682

My point exactly. (Stealing those, BTW, to add to my "hypocrite Jews" collection. Notice how Shmuley takes EVERY criticism as a direct attack and labels it's muh "anti-Semitisms" (tm). Notice none of the comments Shmuley responds to are direct attacks against Jews. They're all criticisms of Shmuley, as a person. However, Shmuley is attempting to ensure that everyone who looks at them will make the assertation that all these people are "anti-Semitic" (tm) because ShmuleySAYSthey are. The only "proof" of "anti-Semitic behavior" is from the Rabbi's perspective, as only Jews can define "Anti-Semitisms" (tm). Shmuley makes it quite clear that only Jews are "allowed to defend themselves" and if you disagree with him we'll, you're an "anti-semite who wants to gas us and cremate us."

 

This is a "Leader" of the Judaic cult. What he's projecting here, is what he teaches to the Jews that enter his Synagogue. The fact that he's becoming emotionally and irrationally unhinged about people questioning his moral compass, only proves that there is complete PANIC among the Zionist Leadership of the Tribe. They know what's coming.

 

And they know they can't stop it.

 

ShmuleyWANTSthe "Goyim" (tm) to "gas and cremate the Jews." It strengthens his control over his flock and perpetuates his psyop.

 

I guarantee you that Shmuley is well insulated from muh "Gas chambers" (tm) should the world suddenly grow tired of Jewish supremacy and start speaking German, singing "Deutschlandlied"

 

We have to beBETTERthan they are.

Anonymous ID: 6493c4 March 25, 2024, 9:17 a.m. No.20623838   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20623802

Indeed. Ask a Jew if their "God" is the Christian "God" and watch the meltdown commence, even though "Jesus was a Jew." Ironically they go even more apeshit when you point out, "Well, why does it say in Judaic texts that "Jesus is in Hell boiling in excrement" if 1)Jesus was a Jew and 2) Jews don't believe in Heaven or Hell. It's fairly easy to disassemble the Jewish psyop if you can keep your cool and have a level head. Kek. It's even easier with the Lolocaust. They lose their fucking minds when you point out that it wasn't "Just the Jews" (tm) in the work camps.

 

An odd irony in the poast from Shmuley. He's admitting he's not "White," but if that's the case, his incessant attacks on "Whites" and "Christians" fall under "hate speech" under US Code 18 Sec 249-251 - The same portion of Code they've used to attack any one who criticizes a single Jew in any capacity.

Anonymous ID: 6493c4 March 25, 2024, 9:54 a.m. No.20623997   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4015 >>4069

>>20623922

 

>No. Jewish people donโ€™t actually like black people.

Correction, Anon. Jewish people don't actually like non-Jewish people. That's why they lump us all together as "Goyim" when we're not around and they're in like company. Some, however, have no qualms using the term publicly, as they have no fear of reprisal for their supremacist views. They know all they have to do is scream muh "anti-Semitisms!" (tm) to have the subject dropped.

>>20623956

>JEWISH MEN LOVE BLACK WOMEN

>I don't this it is actually love, but more like getting something forbidden and the big butt.

It's what we would call "dumpster diving" or "wart hogging." A "Jew" is only a "Jew" if the mother is a "Jew." I won't go into how supremacist that view is, especially considering Jews have no problems using people Jussie Smollet for their ops, even though they'd never consider him a true Jew. Jewish men marry Jewish women first, have children and then divorce them. Allows the Jewish women to milk the system and allows Jewish men to "play" with the "other races."

 

Jewish women, by far, are worse. No matter what, their kids will always be considered "Jew" so they can "play with the other races" all the time. If they get pregnant and they don't want a mudshark, they can just abort. I actually dated a woman, who hid from me that she was Jewish. When I found out, all I did was ask. There was no hate, no bias, no nothing. It was just "Oh wow. I didn't know." She took major offense to my even asking saying the "Star of David" she was wearing in a huge photo of herself hanging in her Mom's home (divorced Mother - see above). A week or two later, she "broke up" with me, saying it "wasn't working."

Anonymous ID: 6493c4 March 25, 2024, 9:57 a.m. No.20624015   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20623997 (me)

>She took major offense to my even asking saying the "Star of David" she was wearing in a huge photo of herself hanging in her Mom's home (divorced Mother - see above)

Sorry forgot to complete this sentence. She tried telling me that it wasn't a "Star of David" and that she's not "Jewish." Claimed it was a "gift of Jewelry" from someone, but wouldn't say from whom.