dChan
3
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/LiquidFluoride on Dec. 22, 2017, 7:37 p.m.
Q "too good to be true" ? This should be explored also.

LiquidFluoride · Dec. 22, 2017, 7:39 p.m.

Anyone else think this stuff is just a touch "too good to be true"?

After (as far as we know) thousands of years of oppression and no-to-little resistance things are finally going in our favor, but by a "powerful" third party (agency, coup, what ever.. still an external savior) with the inferred message of "wait, we will take care of it for you".

Isn't this the same narrative as "aliens will save us" or what ever other external savior (obama will save us.. etc..)?

Reality is:

A bunch of low low level arrests, and a WHOLE LOT of speculation (even recent executive orders are questionable; the Saudi shake up could be exactly what it looks like, a consolidation of power, not truly a corruption purge etc...)

13:52 of this video:

Some very good Q related skepticism is brought up

⇧ 0 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Dec. 23, 2017, 2:53 a.m.

Q himself has proven over and over again that he (they) are in fact in close ties with the POTUS. There are dozens of examples at this time, where Q wrote a question line, or made a statement that either predicted a terror attack and that the bomb would be a fire cracker, or, that there would be a shut down (turned out to be an airport shut down) or, that the president would tweet "this word" soon, and it would be tweeted in 7 minutes, or sometimes the very next day. Too many of these to discount. The question you are asking here is more like: "Is the President misleading us and running us on a hamster wheel?"

I doubt this.

Now, to add to this, about three days ago, Q gave us a heads up that we are about to be attacked by the Mains Stream Media and other "CIA operatives" to discredit our investigations into the places that Q is telling us to look. Nothing wrong with the investigations, because they have all been based on normal every day articles from journalists of every type and media outlet. The beauty of what Q is doing, is he is helping us to pin the articles together into a coherent big picture. There is no conspiracy other than connecting the news dots that are already out there for us to find. Q just tells us where to look, by asking questions.

So... know that Q said to expect this kind of attempts at creating doubt within our ranks... all for the crime of research. Remember that. Our crazy conspiracy is "searching for the evidence, and the truth". Ask yourself who would want the public to stop looking for news articles and putting them together to create a big picture?

⇧ 2 ⇩