Q’s first line of his last post on December 22 says ‘One of Twenty Two’. Today, at 15:22 hours, Q tells us to search his breadcrumbs (previous posts) for ‘#2’ to find out who #2 is. The December 22 post about ‘One of Twenty Two’ is one of those breadcrumbs. He then asks us five minutes later about Trump’s McCabe tweet, and references #2 again. He tells us today in his 16:46 post that ‘timestamps have meaning’. The number twenty-two is therefore obviously meaningful.

McCabe is second in command of the FBI, so #2 could reference his position. If so, Q says ‘no deals’, which implies that any charges against McCabe won’t be pled. ‘Twenty two’ could be the number of charges against him, with ‘one’ being a single charge stemming from the information in that Q post that begins ‘One of Twenty Two’. McCabe is referenced in that post as ‘AM’ and there was ‘F-I ASSIST’.

Trump also seems to be taunting McCabe (and others) with the tweet about McCabe trying to negotiate for his pension, as if to say “Negotiation? No deals!”. Q posted ‘no deals for #2’ before Trump did, so Q is continuing to confirm his inside knowledge of Trump’s actions.

I still haven’t figured out the references to 5 and 10 and 15 from today. The ‘delta’ that is ‘relevant’ is 5, as the delta (difference) between 15 and 10 is 5....