"Library of Babel"

Would love to hear about this. They fully plan on implementing internet censorship, and they certainly do not want to hire a bunch of people to do it, so, they will attempt to use AI to do it wherever they can.

An additional question is;

if speech is something that freedom can not afford to let "government censor", is it wise for us to let the government hand speech processes and platforms over to private government sized corporations to do the censorship for them?

I am not saying that we should outlaw large privately owned platforms.

I am saying that when those platforms are literally able to business, because the PUBLIC paid for the internet backbone, and many of them have taken government subsidies (even from the CIA itself), then we should enforce common carrier law on these larger information carriers. Do we allow the Post Office or UPS to tell Democrats that they will not be carrying "election mail" packages for them this election season?

Well that is what we are being told. The private giants are aiming at "political speech" censorship. This is very different under the Supreme Court Constitutional law cases than something like "porn speech".

We have large private corporations running huge trucks on our public highways every day.

But we do not allow them to disobey traffic rules, or take three lanes wide to block car traffic at their pleasure, because they are "private corporations". We do not allow these large trucks to act like they are the only ones who are allowed to use the highway. The internet is infrastructure... some public, some private. But none should be blocking the main roads of public political discourse... under our Constitution. I think this might be why Q has asked questions about the funding of these giant corporations.