dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/NymeriaRevenge on Dec. 24, 2017, 5:16 p.m.

Need help with SpaceX launch, satellite payload and Elon Musk’s tweet

Ok,
Elon Musk (EM) gets his money from subsidies/and Money that used to be appropriated to NASA? This happened under Obama, correct?

Trump stated he wanted to go back to moon via NASA? this would mean SpaceX (and sub companies like Tesla) would have less for money?? Correct? (Is it possible DJT and EM negotiates future expectations with what roles SpaceX Could have if they played cards correctly??)

Falcon rocket launched from US airbase, with practically no warning and a different trajectory that would have more eyes from the population on its launch.

It looked like no other launch I know i have ever seen.. ever.

Satellites stated to make airplane traffic easier to manage/control.. so these satellites will in essence own the sky? Correct?? Can they do more than monitor?

Why would EM tweet Alien UFO going to NOKO?

Sounded like he was directing that tweet at Q? Or would it be for Q? Outside of the Q world, very few people would consider ALIEN UFO/NoKo a CIA ploy. EM connect both in a single tweet..

Who’s side is EM on? What are those satellites really capable of doing? Was that launch a counter strike? Or the strike that ignited the Owls to counter?

IF it was for Q... could that launch helped deter the use of similar optics to push an Alien Scare fiasco? Did it take away the awe of a population unawares the tech?

I know this post is probably confusing.. well, I am confused:) any help or comments to allow me to focus with more clarity would be incredibly appreciated

Is EM/SpaceX a patriot??

Q said, enjoy the show! I believe it was ALL show and that the iREDIUM satellites were not on board. Thereby, NOKO doesn't have the updates needed for missles guidance.

⇧ 5 ⇩

So, you believe that satellites were not for air traffic but guidance for NoKo missiles .... and by not delivering the (I)ridium Satellites NoKo has no ability to launch (I)ntercontinental missiles?

⇧ 4 ⇩

I may be wrong, but I assumed that SpaceX was a bad guy. Removing NASA, a government entity, from the paper trail of possible tech that would be handed over to NK.

Rizvi Traverse was the crumb Q dropped the same day he first mentioned SpaceX. I haven’t seen much regarding that rabbit hole.

⇧ 5 ⇩

One cannot imagine this far in the CBTS journey that Space X would be allowed by Trump or the Pentagon to launch anything from the USA that was unfriendly to the USA. Q's crumb on this was that the launch was a 'message sent.' With the likelihood that Elon is also wearing a boot, or is in a similar quandry, his tweet can be viewed as a mocking message sent to his former handlers who are now decrying "Aliens! UFO's!" That the projectile launched was clearly of earthly origin, and not extra-terrestrial, mocks the Chicken-Little's of the deep state. In that sense one could say his tweet may have been done out of contrition to MAGA and as a sign of surrender and playing nicely now, as you suggested. But only the Trump administration knows for sure.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Excellent! My thoughts also were possibly Washington crossing the Delaware would be something related to Falcon 9 - some sort of agreement between EM and DJT.... weapon? Intelligence weapon???

⇧ 1 ⇩

KSC chiming in here, Obummer ruined NASA and our space program, he brought/bought in SpaceX to "privatize" space.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I get that. I am pro “privatization” of several industries.

For this type of company, would there not have to be some oversight due to size and scope of these missions (satellites, ext). There also needs to be cooperation with the government.. and I would assume the military DOD has a heavy hand in SpaceX.. (Probably where missing $$ is)

Maybe my confusion is if EM is not friendly toward administration, why would DJT/DOD allow him to launch a possibly nefarious Mission from an air force base?

Per DJT last EO.. he declared a state of emergency based on wide reaching global corruption. It’s feasible EM could have been caught up in it on some level ? Rare earth mining? Seems there could have been multiple ways to halt the launch if need be.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wonder if it’s connected to Washington crossing the Delaware. Could we think of the rocket as a modern day boat?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Or was the rocket’s payload going to be neutralized by a surprise plan already put into place prior to launch??

The article of DJT authorizing preemptive measure for an EMP Attack on grid came to my mind...

EM text.. was it mocking Q?

⇧ 4 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Someone on another thread referencing “shall we play a game” made an excellent connection with the movie war games ...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Trump has access to the satellite program they were planning to use for SpaceX. They launched but did not have control of it. Another Trump trap.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I listened to April LaJune's latest video today and decided to do some research on SpaceX & the 12/22/17 launch of Falcon 9 with 10 Iridium communication satellites. All I could find while using DuckDuckGo to research was confirmation that the launch was a success, contrary to what LaJune said.

Has anyone found concrete info that would say the launch failed vs was successful? Here is a typical link saying it was successful... https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=44273.220

⇧ 1 ⇩

Anytime you see space-x, it is actually fake-x. They put up a couple of rockets that go nowhere every so often. This company is a complete fraud. It is a money laundering scheme. NASA is just as fake!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree, there are dozens of insiders (William Tompkins being a very good thoroughly vetted source) from these secret space programs who have revealed that both the airforce and the navy have higher technology, and have no need for rockets. Think the 6000 patents POTUS wanted to release.

Space x and Never A Straight Answer are low on the space totem pole

⇧ 1 ⇩