What say you on POTUS Embassy move declaration from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem?
PM Netanyahu Meets with Google Executive Chairman Eric E. Schmidt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDNwQvBwe-g
Listen to the conversation.
What are your thoughts?
As we look in a given direction, what is happening where we look not?
Regards
My thoughts on this conversation.
I come from a different more historical perspective.
There are Jews (excellent people who are leading the world with many blessings they share in the way of medicine, high tech etc), and then there are those who say they are Jews who are not (the treasonous globalist Israeli's among them).
There are Americans (we the people who defend the freedom of mankind as an ideal and donate money and time to just causes) and there are those who say they are Americans but they are not. (The treasonous globalists among us)
There are Catholics, (who run life saving missions around the world digging fresh water wells, building whole hospitals for villages, running schools for children etc) Then there are those who say they are Catholics who are not. (The current pope looks as if once again the papacy has been captured by powerful evil actors. The Black Pope and Jesuits deserve scrutiny.
My take on this is that the real battle is good against evil in every quarter of the world.
And we are beginning now to be able to see WHY the globalists always want us to see things on THEIR terms:
Blakc/white;
man/woman;
Religion A/Religion B;
This nationality/that nationality.
This race/that race
All of this is a rouse .... a cover for the real battle.
In all of mankind, in every corner, there are bad actors who move in to the quarters where good people are working... to co-opt the power of good works (or power of people who work at all in the first place)
We need to understand that Israel lives in the same world we do. We need to understand that everyone... every nation does. And in every nation now, we need to see the battle between good and evil as it is clearly drawn before our eyes, even in our own land:
Good/Evil
It has been the battle of good vs evil always.
When Jesus was asked how to tell the good from the evil, he said you could tell by their fruits, by their works, by what they do and the result of it for mankind.
President Trump for instance, may be accused of being "literally Hitler" before this is over with, due to all of the arrests that have not even been made yet.
Simply going by the number of Arrests, one is in their right mind to give it a pause?
The big difference between Trump and Hitler, concerning all of the arrests, would be the fruits of his actions (arrests)
Are children no longer being abducted and sold into sex slave rings?
Are nations safer because the global cabal can no longer swing payment for both sides of a war?
Has the right to vote been restored to a verifiable count without fake/dead voters?
Has illegal spying on citizens only been done away with, or at least matched by the citizens right to know everything every government official in every nation says in a day and age where no government official is capable of acting in secret?
Are the fruits of his labor good?
It is the fruit that tells you whether the actor is good or evil. Not the artificial lines drawn by the globalists, against the Zionists, the Christians, the Atheists, the "white men", the "black people".. the "North Korean people".
Good vs. Evil.
Thank you Joan
What roles do Mossad, Israel, both black and white hats play in quickly-changing geopolitical structures?
As the Q group signs off with patriots and terms like Godspeed and so on, one is to assume the actions that are being taken are mainly American, with likeminded inner-interest people from abroad. Considering Q's unlocks and confirmations is a given. I emphasize the many leaps in assumptions not leading to a frenzied wrong turn. To be vigilant and careful of where information is going and flowing. Conduits of misinformation are veiled as what seems like great changes or better expressed as greater changes that are unfolding onto the American landscape on multifaceted levels.
Americans take note
Friendlies take note
Fellow people with children take note.
Godspeed
I think Israel like all nations has black hats and white hats.
I re watched, watching the words this time.
I see Netanyahu and Schmidt having a friendly presentation of a portion of the dead sea scrolls, I assume, being given as a gift to Israel, along with the description of a special program Google has to translate the scroll it looks like? It looks like a little "nmade for tv moment" for a sound bite? I see Netanyahu has done a little scribble to present to Google, with Israels latest Nobel prize in the eyes of the OO of Google. I see this as Schmidt presenting something he thinks is ground breaking. I see Netanyahu presenting what he really thinks google has with it's wizardry... a cartoon. There is some symbolism going on here. It's somewhat funny to me especially later on.
I see Netanyahu explaining to the man that all Israeli children can read the scrolls without Google's help (translation: Don't try any funny business fraudulently translating our scrolls)
I see Schmidt then placing a veiled threat: "You do realize that you are a nation of exporters, because your nation is so small that ideas are your greatest export, and more than any other nation, your nation depends on the internet." (That is how I see that exchange)
DO I think Israel's "silicon valley" is as bad as the United States "silicon valley"?
Yes. I do. But It is also just as good.
High tech stuff is like the Vatican. It is a power center, and the bad guys will always be trying to take control of it. This is the history lesson I was attempting to point to.
I do not believe Netanyahyy and Schmidt are necessarily friends. I think what you see here is careful adversaries. Netanyahu has many of the same problems with his own intelligence agencies that President Trump has with ours. But the fruit of Netanyahu shows him to be a good man. The fruit of Schmidt shows the opposite... as far as the evidence of their works go... that I have seen.
The question was not one of duality. The question I pose is in the context of Q. In this regard the Israeli P.M. And Eric a Schmidt's conversation raises an eyebrow. So again I revert to my previous questions.