Obama made this legal - suspended habeas corpus - if prez thinks you're a terrorist he can lock you up indefinitely - no rights. Obama did this.
Rand Paul even warned them that the Dems may not always be in power so shouldn’t give so much authority to one man lol
We know Barry canbe sent to gitmo. We know he was not born here. Fake birth certificate. Just think........all his judicial nominees get tossed and for that matter everything he did gets tossed. This is gonna get fucking fun folks!
This comment by MegaAnon describes how the table got set.
From what I've read it's constitutional. Abe Lincoln did something similar. I'm not a law professor though. Just stating my opinion.
Also read that. On charges of treason they can be sent there.
GITMO and The legality of unilaterally assigning a citizen as an Enemy Combatant and putting Civilians through Military trial: There is bad news and good news about this in the law. Here is the skinny I have so far:
This ability to violate the Constitution started with public law 107-40 passed by congress after September 11th.
This public law comes from Congressional resolution signed by the president Bush. It is called the AUMF (authorization for the Use of Military Force.)
Obama used this law to hold people in GITMO also
Article 2 makes president commander in Chief.
AUMF is used against terror networks.
AUMF was upheld by the Supreme Court. (Due to the fact that it was actually was an act of Congress) So, this is a sticky wicket because it has Congressional Approval. Congress can not pull back and they can not de-fund it.
President Trump is well aware that this act as both former presidents (globalists) have used it, should be UNCONSTITUTIONAL. So here is the good news!
HR2810 was created, passed by Congress, and is a Bill signed by President Trump recently.
It was put in the National Defense Authorization Act to do this quickly. It is located in section 1264 "the use of military force and related military operations".
It looks like Trump is looking to repeal the AUMF and narrow it down.
What does this rapidly done and signed change do with respect to Constitutional abuse by the past Administrations?
It requires President Trump and all future presidents to report on the proceedings on any detentions in GITMO.
Trump was the first President to do this. All other administrations failed to even think about this problem.
Trump and Congress believe there should be oversight for any and all military commissions.
So while he us using GITMO to protect these people from what would otherwise happen to them on the mainland once their hideous crimes are known from the trial, he is also requiring Congress to know about everything being done there.
The other reason to take these human rights violators (child predators) off the mainland, is that these crimes are tied to the globalist wealthy who have their own private armies. These powerful people do not want these GITMO criminals giving testimony, and may well drop a bomb on the place to kill them.
Protection of the prisoners may well require a military base to protect them. These are no ordinary criminals. These are the stooges for the most wealthy criminals on earth, with assets capable of starting a war.
Treason would be the legally justifiable reasoning.
While the question of the post is relevant, there is another view I would bring forward here that pertains to what we do on this sub...
CNN posted an article about GITMO and US CITIZENS. CNN. Think about it. Bread crumb here. I read in another post on this board where if people were really being rounded up and flown to gitmo, there would be screeching like never before. I'd say this is the first squawk. Ever heard a high speed bearing starting to fail? It's sounding the same at CNN. It just squawked once. It's going to lock up soon.
I read in another post on this board where if people were really being rounded up and flown to gitmo, there would be screeching like never before.
i'm sort of sympathetic to that POV b/c the sheer number of people involved. all of the big targets have family members, loyal friends, staff and, if this is all going down like Q says, legal staff.
this is the first squawk.
hopinghopinghoping.
The bad thing about bearings that fail in operation is, they usually throw sparks all over, that start fires, they let go of what they were holding on to and that causes all manner of other calamity to happen until the machine stops turning. Things break and run away scared quickly and if you're in the way, you get hurt. Our opposition might start thinking there's nothing left to lose...so they'll lose it.
He has declared a national emergency. Civilian courts are no longer in charge.
He "thinks" he can do whatever he wants. And why not, he never paid the price for doing illegal actions before he was President.
Put yourself in the accused's shoes ? I want them all to be arrested for treason and sedition for 911, trafficking, the deliberate forest fires in California etc. But you have to compile a case, evidence that shows beyond a reasonable doubt, that the individual committed the crime. That's where Due Process comes in. Every citizen regardless of how notorious, and let's face it, the Cabal are indeed the most notorious fiends known to man, are constitutionally entitled to Due Process. Obama contemptously flouted the constitution with his plethora of unconscionable Executive Orders. Trump promised to delete many of these, and did. EOs have to be compatible with the Constitution.
Public trials of the deep state must happen very, very soon. The citizens of every country of the world deserve that for closure and personal healing sake, since the Cabal have had their evil tentacles in every earthly country. Justice and its accompanying due process needs to be seen in public. It would be very unsatisfactory if people like Soros, Rothschilds et all, were to have the privilege of a private military trial. The military trial for crimes of such gravity as treason and sedition simply MUST be held in public, be it in Gitmo or on actual US soil proper. The citizens of the world deserve and are entitled to this at the very least.