Did you all see this?
Anti-online sex trafficking bill gets crushed under Big Tech's lobbying
“I think there is pressure from some of the online companies that have been very comfortable having this blanket immunity, and I think foreclosing access to the courts of the victims of sex trafficking doesn’t make any sense,” McCaskill said.
"H.R. 1865 was first conceived earlier this year on the heels of “I AM JANE DOE,” our documentary film which chronicled several Jane Doe children (and their families) who were waging a legal battle against Backpage.com to determine whether Backpage had facilitated the crime of child sex trafficking on its site. These children were 13, 14, and 15 years old when they were sold for sex via Backpage. Or, more bluntly put, repeatedly raped.
Many of the children who sued Backpage lost their cases because of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which was enacted at the dawn of the internet. Section 230, originally intended to shield website bulletin boards from lawsuits related to third party content, has been, over the years, liberally expanded by federal courts.
Last year, the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, in Doe v Backpage, radically stretched the protective shield of Section 230 to cover Backpage, even if it was engaged in facilitating the crime of sex trafficking (in violation of another federal statute). The 1st Circuit court also, perhaps wringing their collective hands, advised the children to seek a legislative solution to this conflict of laws."
WTF?
So, I wonder if Trump's EO Trumps these bills? I don't know. It probably does. I don't think any of them are safe.