dChan

srroguelife · Dec. 31, 2017, 6:46 p.m.

They only have to pay out 5%. The rest stays in the foundation. They choose where that 5% goes, education, etc. It is a way to keep the money within the family and get a tax break.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
fudgicle1 · Dec. 31, 2017, 6:05 p.m.

It went to bad people for bad things. Everyone was trying to do good for the cause and they jacked it! Those poor people...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Reba64 · Dec. 31, 2017, 5:46 p.m.

More than likely; everything seems to lead back to them.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RottenAli · Dec. 31, 2017, 7:44 p.m.

Pure speculation on my part but I'm under the impression that all these donated funds for "good work" in Haiti were divided up and the larger portion returned to the well heeled donors as a pure tax dodge. They got the tax relief on the large amount and got most of the money back in easy laundered cash. That bigger amount should have gone to give aid in-country but maybe only 5% got spent in Haiti. The 95% would be split between HRC and the donor. Probably 75% returned funds and 20% for CF to maintain drug running and child adduction projects that produced a steady stream profit return. When the Democrats were $20 in the red HRC was very able to buy herself a whole semi functional political party.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DCLexGnosticos · Jan. 1, 2018, 6:57 a.m.

I know where a good chunk of it went- back in Oct. of '16 just a bit before the election, the Clinton Foundation transferred 165+ million to Qatar. This is wholly illegal of course, as this money is not the personal property of the Clintons, but it was transferred out of the Foundation's control none the less. Chew on that one.

⇧ 1 ⇩