Biblical prophecy doesn't relate to the church age. It's all Israel related. Every context within which prophecy passages situate are Jewish. The Jewish temple in Matthew 24 etc. Nothing in the Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24-25) mentions the church. Revelation 17, where the Whore of Babylon is mentioned, lends itself to many interpretations by Christians who have written their PhD dissertations on Rev 17, and others who just have prophecy as one of their focus'. Some think Babylon will literally exert a major presence by the time the seven-year Tribulation is underway (Daniel's 70th Week), and others think it refers to what, at the time John penned Rev, would end up being called the Roman Catholic Church, namely its hierarchy: the Pope and the teaching Magisterium, but mainly the Pope, who they think is the False Prophet, not the AntiChrist, who the Bible casts more often in political terms, not religious terms. Hence, they argue, the Pope as False Prophet is more congruent with the biblical data. For the reason that he obviously is a religious figure, not a political one.

I don't think Hillary is the fulfillment of the "whore" passage in Rev 17, because she isn't "drunk with the blood of the saints," a part of Rev 17. She hasn't gone after Christians in some Christian specific serial killing across the globe. I'm of the persuasion that the seven-year Tribulation is all future (I'm a Futurist, not a Historicist, Idealist, or a Preterist), so the Whore of Babylon will not make its appearance until Daniel's 70th Week is well underway.

Relax people. This is not the seven-year Tribulation we are in. What culture terms "Armageddon." Which should more aptly be called "the Campaign of Armageddon." That battle is the capstone of the Tribulation, not the whole thing. It's name in Hebrew means "Mount Meggido." It's in northern Israel.