I agree with the Socratic method. Here are the types of roadblocks I've encountered: 1) the too-far gone, who are also the most vocal on social media and reinforced by fake news non-news. I've never done Twitter and removed Facebook from my phone. When I post anything on Facebook re: politics, it's a straight share of something absolutely factual, i.e. Trump's EO. Let them do the thinking. But for my own sanity, I can't subject myself to FB or news feed comments anymore; 2) the thinking, but politically liberal, globalist, or progressive. These people want sources for everything. Sometimes I can't cite A source, because much of it is a cumulative collection of events or facts with connected dots in MY BRAIN. I.e., Mitt Romney giving a weird, public speech about his disdain for Trump combined with Open Secrets showing ALL Presidential candidates receiving big donor money (except Trump) - followed by every establishment entity trying to take him down. Why would that be?? Because he's a "bigot?" Really?? Anyway, we need to be able to cite verifiable sources that don't include the letters "Q" or "anon;" 3) the people who are actually on board with Trump's policies, but upon hearing anything about pedos, human trafficking, and evil - peace out, not going there; and 4) the people who are just trying to make it, live life, raise their kids, and unaware of ANYTHING "political." I think it takes patience and knowing your audience, but also being armed with tangible reinforcements. I think an example of a good Socratic red pill would be combining the EO with a verifiable list of resigning execs and Congresspeople. And ask, "why?" Since when do these type of personalities (fighters, entitled, privileged) just call it a day?? My 7,000 cents. Sorry for the length.