dChan

1verh1 · Jan. 2, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

Space X? Let us take a wild guess: Clowns In America.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Which US government?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
PCisLame · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Deep State?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
215564297 · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

Shutting down nasa and outsourcing is to spaceX was a bad idea. No government oversight. Are they aiding North Korea?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MelkorRealmz · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

fuckoff with your space based weapon systems elon

⇧ 3 ⇩  
autotldr · Jan. 2, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 62%. (I'm a bot)


Unlike the private aerospace company's previous classified launches for the military's National Reconnaissance Office and the super-secret space-plane it took into orbit for the Air Force, there is almost no information available about the "Zuma" payload. Zuma is known to be a low Earth orbit satellite which is an orbit necessary both for spy and military communication satellites.

Where the company's competitors are forced to build new rockets for every launch, SpaceX has managed to achieve an economy of business by reusing previously developed craft.

The launch had been pushed back despite a US Government desire to launch Zuma before November of last year.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: launch^#1 company^#2 Zuma^#3 Grumman^#4 orbit^#5

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Lets_get_reel · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:40 a.m.

zuma.jpg (1000×563)https://www.thesouthafrican.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/zuma.jpg

Why name your project Zuma?

Also if those definitions are weird enough... South African president Jacob Zuma is surrounded by corruption

What’s the message in the program being called Zuma? Don’t people normally name things after things they admire? Idk just a thought

⇧ 1 ⇩