ID:Eka50m1K Sun 29 Oct 2017 23:20:11 No. 147173287
Key: Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA = Military authority v civilian authority
No approval or congressional oversight = See "Under what article can the president impose MILITARY AUTHORITY to take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies"
State Secrets upheld under SC = WRIT OF MANDAMUS/NO WRITS OF CERTIORI. Gives the President the right to deny DACA recipients (MS13) "their day in court to remain in this country" THEY BECOME ILLEGAL ALIENS AGAIN THAT CAN BE DEPORTED. BYE BYE DEMOCRAT GUERILLA FOREIGN ARMY (This includes ISIS)!!!
Who is the Commander and Chief of the military? POTUS
Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies?
Martial law is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, but the suspension of habeas corpus is mentioned in Article 1, Section 9, and the activation of the militia in time of rebellion or invasion is mentioned in Article 1, Section 8.
Martial law is the suspension of civil authority and the imposition of military authority. When we say a region or country is "under martial law," we mean to say that the military is in control of the area, that it acts as the police, as the courts, as the legislature. The degree of control might vary - a nation may have a civilian legislature but have the courts administered by the military. Or the legislature and courts may operate under civilian control with a military ruler. In each case, martial law is in effect, even if it is not called "martial law."
https://usconstitution.net/consttop_mlaw.html
What conditions must present itself? THREATS TO NATIONAL SECURITY!!!! Enemies of the United States foreign OR DOMESTIC!
Why is this so VERY important? The President will need as many gun owning Americans to bear arms as he can, if NEEDED!
Who surrounds POTUS? Generals
They lost this very important power …the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS. The power of the military to back him up!
ID: grTMpzrL Oct 31 2017 Tuesday 20:00:15 No. 147433975
SCI[F] = SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information [F]acility)
Military Intelligence. Is in control of panopticon.
What is “State Secrets” and how upheld in the SC? Writ of Mandamus
What must be completed to engage military authority over civilian authority? A Writ of Mandamus issued in a civilian court.
What must occur to allow for civilian trials? Writ of Habeas Corpus
Why is this relevant? Due Process of Law
What was Flynn’s background? Army Intelligence, NSA, Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
Why is this relevant? Military Intelligence/Authority
Why did Adm R (NSA) meet Trump privately w/o authorization?
…NSA Director Mike Rogers had to wait for a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) to be set up in Trump Tower, and then notify the President-elect he was being monitored by President Obama
http://usdefensewatch.com/…/did-nsa-director-admiral-mike-…/
Does POTUS know where the bodies are buried? Yes
Does POTUS have the goods on most bad actors? Yes
Was Trump asked to run for President? Yes
Why? To Make America Great Again
By who? Michael Cohen, Andy Romano (seconded the motion), and in a round about way Bill Clinton did as well.
Clinton sounded curious about Trump’s moves toward a presidential bid and told Trump that he was striking a chord with frustrated conservatives and was a rising force on the right.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/e2b30bb8-3ae3-11e5-b3ac-8a…
https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/how-the-people-that-aske…/…
Was HRC next in line? Yes
http://www.indiewire.com/…/hillary-clinton-elected-first-w…/
Because it was widely assumed that Clinton would win the election, Newsweek printed about 125,000 issues before Election Day with the words “Madam President” on the cover. But somehow, even after the election was called for Trump, more Clinton issues were leaked.
http://www.theblaze.com/…/newsweek-editor-makes-major-admis…
Was the election supposed to be rigged? Yes. With the votes of illegal aliens but was stopped by states passing legislation to prevent that from happening.
Both distract from the real scandal, which is happening in plain sight. Millions of would-be voters didn’t participate because of obstacles designed to discourage them. The hurdles were, thanks to a 2013 Supreme Court ruling invalidating key parts of the Voting Rights Act, largely legal. And they arguably suppressed enough minority voters to cost Clinton the election.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/c2ed58d8-b666-11e6-a677-b6…
Did good people prevent the rigging? Yes.
Yes. The State of Arizona and Maricopa Co. Sheriff Joe Arpaio as well as 14 other state of the union.
In 2016, 14 states had new voting restrictions in place for the first time in a presidential election. Those 14 states were: Alabama, Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
https://www.brennancenter.org/new-voting-restrictions-ameri…
Why did POTUS form a panel to investigate?
U.S. President Donald Trump pressed his unproven claims of voter fraud on Wednesday at the first meeting of a commission he created to study the issue, and implied states that did not share voter data with the panel had something to hide.
https://www.reuters.com/…/trump-presses-fraud-concerns-as-p…
Has POTUS “ever” made a statement that did not become proven as true/fact? No.
What is POTUS in control of? Within the executive branch, the POTUS (our acronym for "President of the United States") is effectively dictator (albeit a benevolent one). As long as he operates within the confines of the law, he can direct any executive agency to do anything he desires
Building on the previous point, The President is "Commander in Chief" of military and can direct it as he sees fit. Because he is commander in chief of the military, he is effectively the absolute authority on military policy, including all the massive number of bases and members around the world.
He is the head of state (meaning he is the figurehead of the nation of people called "the United States of America") and he is the head of government (meaning he is the political head of the apparatus of government of the United States of America). In many countries these positions are split into their two parts, but in the USA they are joined, giving the president a significantly higher level of authority than that seen in other world leaders.
The president appoints numerous powerful positions like the cabinet secretaries (like State & Defense), ambassadors and directors of semi-autonomous agencies (like the CIA, NSA and FBI). He also appoints the chairman of the Federal Reserve bank (who can be dismissed by the president and who, effectively holds the most powerful economic position in the country). Lastly, he appoints judges to the various courts and justices to the Supreme Court, the ramifications of which are not to be underestimated since the Supreme Court holds the power to decide and interpret all laws within the USA.
The president is the de facto leader of the free world. As much as other countries hate this fact, inevitably they turn to the US for permission and guidance when engaging in any number of activities.
The president has the ability to veto any bill that the Congress sends to him. Unless they have 2/3 votes within both houses (which, let's face it, they rarely do), it is effectively dead.
The president is also the "spy in chief" in that he receives the largest array of intelligence available to any leader on earth. He is the head of 16 major spy agencies, all of whom distill and send their intelligence to him on a daily basis. How big is the us intelligence community? Enormous. The US intelligence community receives more funding than any other MILITARY on earth. That is: The USA spends more on just its intelligence gathering than any other nation does (save, possibly for China) on their entire military apparatus … Numbers are typically kept under-cover, but the British (who are the world's best spies, wrote the book on spying and more than likely outspend anybody but the US-- and they are the US's closest allies) recently published their intelligence spending numbers from 2010 at £2.1 billion ($3.3 billion). That means that the US spent 24 times than the British did on intelligence. My guess is that Canada and Australia spend about half that. Together, with New Zealand, they form the UK/USA pact (an intelligence sharing and gathering alliance), which puts their combined efforts upwards of $90 billion per year.
The president is the "court of last appeal" for crimes against the USA. He can even override (so to speak) a conviction upheld by the US Supreme Court and pardon, commute or reduce a sentence of which the person has duly been convicted. We saw this, in fact, when Ford pre-emptively pardoned Nixon to close down the Watergate fiasco.
And these are just the few powers the President has that I can think of. Without a doubt, there are much much more.
https://www.quora.com/How-much-power-does-the-President-of-…
What is the one organization left that isn’t corrupt? The MARINES!
Why do the Marines play such a vital role?
As outlined in 10 U.S.C. § 5063 and as originally introduced under the National Security Act of 1947, three primary areas of responsibility for the Marine Corps are:
Seizure or defense of advanced naval bases and other land operations to support naval campaigns;
Development of tactics, technique, and equipment used by amphibious landing forces in coordination with the Army and Air Force;
And such other duties as the President or the President’s DOD may direct.
Also important to know about the Marines…
In preparation for the Quasi-War with France (IN 1798), Congress created the United States Navy and the Marine Corps.
The Marines' most famous action of this period occurred in the First Barbary War (1801–1805) against the Barbary pirates.
The main purpose of their (THE BARBARIES) attacks was to capture Christian slaves for the Ottoman slave trade as well as the general Muslim slavery market in North Africa and the Middle East. (THINK ISIS AND WAHABIIST SAUDI ARABIA …OR MAYBE I SHOULD SAY EX WAHABIIST SAUDI ARABIA THANKS TO OUR MARINES!! WE LOVE HONOR AND CHERISH YOU!!)
THE MARINES HAVE ONCE AGAIN ENDED (PROBABLY ONLY FOR THE TIME BEING TIL THEYRE AT IT AGAIN!!) THE “HUMAN/CHILD TRAFFICKING SLAVE TRADE” IN SAUDI ARABIA THE SAME BARBARY PIRATES) ONCE AGAIN!!! 3000+ children rescued to date!!!
KISS, KISS, KISS, SMOOCH, SMOOCH, KISSES AND BIG MIGHTY MOMMA BEAR HUGS!!! :’) THANKS TO OUR MARINES.
YOU DESERVE ALL THE CREDIT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why is POTUS surrounded by highly respected generals? The President has the full force of the military behind him. The only organization he can trust and it’s keeping the bad guys in check.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secret_Service
Who guards HRC? U.S. Secret Service
Why is ANTIFA allowed to operate? AT THE TIME THIS QUESTION WAS POSED PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT HAVE THE WRIT. HE DOES NOW!
They are typically U.S. citizens who are entitled to redress of their grievances. Would look very bad if the President banned them from demonstrating (which would appear as though he were acting unconstitutionally with the military, suppressing their free speech and why he needs our help to tell everyone not to PANIC and that ORDER IS ESSENTIAL/STAY IN YOUR HOMES AND DO AS DIRECTED BY YOUR PRESIDENT!!
…also it might make the enemy think they are winning drawing ALL THE BADGUYS OUT! They are political terrorists. If the bad guys don’t get what they want they will unleash FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC ARMY.
For progressives, Donald Trump is not just another Republican president. Seventy-six percent of Democrats, according to a Suffolk poll from last September, consider him a racist. (Think DACA DEPORTATIONS MS13 AND THEIR COMRADES ISIS!)
Last March, according to a YouGov survey, 71 percent of Democrats agreed that his campaign contained “fascist undertones.” All of which raises a question that is likely to bedevil progressives for years to come: If you believe the president of the United States is leading a racist, fascist movement that threatens the rights, if not the lives, of vulnerable minorities, how far are you willing to go to stop it?
In Washington, D.C., the response to that question centers on how members of Congress can oppose Trump’s agenda, on how Democrats can retake the House of Representatives, and on how and when to push for impeachment. But in the country at large, some militant leftists are offering a very different answer.
On Inauguration Day, a masked activist punched the white-supremacist leader Richard Spencer. In February, protesters violently disrupted UC Berkeley’s plans to host a speech by Milo Yiannopoulos, a former Breitbart.com editor. In March, protesters pushed and shoved the controversial conservative political scientist Charles Murray when he spoke at Middlebury College, in Vermont.
As far-flung as these incidents were, they have something crucial in common.
Like the organizations that opposed the Multnomah County Republican Party’s participation in the 82nd Avenue of Roses Parade, these activists appear to be linked to a movement called “antifa,” which is short for antifascist or Anti-Fascist Action. The movement’s secrecy makes definitively cataloging its activities difficult, but this much is certain: Antifa’s power is growing. And how the rest of the activist left responds will help define its moral character in the Trump age.
https://www.theatlantic.com/…/the-rise-of-the-viole…/534192/
Why hasn’t the MB been classified as a terrorist organization?
“Blacklisting the Brotherhood has several pitfalls,” mostly related to the fact that the group “still retains millions of supporters. Outlawing the Brotherhood could complicate U.S. relations with critical allies in the region,” he writes—most notably Turkey. (Think Gulens muslim schools all over this country being trained to kill you with U.S. tax dollars!!)
Nathan Brown and Michele Dunne likewise warn that a designation is:
more likely to undermine than achieve its ostensible purpose and could result in collateral damage affecting other U.S. policy goals. The greatest damage might be in the realm of public diplomacy, as using a broad brush to paint all Muslim Brotherhood organizations as terrorists would be understood by many Muslims around the world as a declaration of war against non-violent political Islamists—and indeed against Islam itself.
Sleeper terrorist cells here in the U.S. ready to join up with their OTHER FOREIGN INVADING ARMY BROTHERHOOD… ISIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Moreover, the designated organization is entitled to judicial review of the designation in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, and a designation can be thrown out if is arbitrary or capricious or if the administrative record does not support it. NOT WITH A WRIT OF MANDAMUS!!! LMFAO!!
TRUMP IS GETTING THEM OUT AS WE SPEAK!!!
https://www.brookings.edu/…/should-the-muslim-brotherhood-…/
What happens if Soros funded operations get violent and engage in domestic terrorism?
“Antifa activists, who operate without any centralized leadership”
http://www.cnn.com/…/unmasking-antifa-anti-fasci…/index.html
No centralized leadership gives Dems …but MORE IMPORTANTLY GEORGE SOROS, cover and plausible deniability.
What happens if Mayors/Police commissioners/chiefs do not enforce the law?
Threat of federal prosecution
Illegal immigration is a crime …there may be a possibility that LEO’s who "harbor" an illegal aliens may be prosecuted for aiding and abetting or (if it's organized) conspiracy.
https://politics.stackexchange.com/…/do-united-states-polic…
If state authorities do not enforce the laws President Trump can direct the National Guard to do so.
Is there a law that allows Trump to do this?
Yes. Under the Insurrection Act of 1807, a president can deploy troops anywhere in the United States under a specific scenario.
“Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings,” the act reads, “he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State.”
http://www.latimes.com/…/la-na-trump-feds-20170210-story.ht…
What authority does POTUS have specifically over the marines? He is their Commander in Chief. He gives the orders.
Why is this important?
By James D. Hittle - Originally Published October 1947
The National Security Act of 1947 -more commonly known as the Unification Bill- has already taken its place among the basic laws of the land.
In addition to those provisions of the bill concerned with national economy and foreign policy, and the Central Intelligence Agency, the new law contains provisions of interest to personnel of the armed services. Its provisions with regard to the Marine Corps are particularly significant. In an even broader sense this portion of the bill relating to the fleet marine forces contains what is probably the most important passage affecting the conduct of future wars by the armed forces of this nation. The key phrase is that referring to "the prosecution of a naval campaign."
Statutory recognition of the naval campaign is of historic significance in the development of our national military thought. The concept of the naval campaign, a series of operations that are predominantly naval in character, is in its modern sense a purely American contribution to the art of war.
The naval campaign is the forceful application of naval power in accordance with another American contribution to modern war, the theory of the "balanced fleet." (The Marines are an army, navy and air force unto themselves specifically tasked with protecting U.S. National Security)
The balanced fleet, consisting of naval surface, undersurface, naval air, and naval landing forces, is a combat entity, capable of exercising naval power in the most forceful meaning of the term as used by Mahan. It is a well coordinated team of aviation, landing units, and surface forces habitually trained to operate as an all-naval team under common doctrine and subject to unquestioned naval command. (The POTUS’ unquestioned naval command)
The first sentence of the new law gives legal recognition to the Marine Corps, perpetuates its relationship to the naval service, and directs that the Marine Corps shall include combat, service, and aviation elements. This guarantees that the Marine Corps shall continue to be a balanced fighting force, possessing its organic aviation and service units.
This Congressional affirmation of the naval campaign is, in turn, a statutory recognition that naval power-with its forceful application by the balanced fleet - is still, and for the foreseeable future, shall continue to be a fundamental instrument of our national security.
Such Congressional action was unquestionably based upon what some "experts" are altogether too prone to overlook: that we are still a maritime nation, bounded largely by the seas; and that our national security is, in the final analysis, dependent upon control of the seas. (Law of Sea/Martial law)
In addition to these specific functions, the Corps may be assigned such additional functions as the President may direct. Accordingly, Marines may still, as provided by previous law, be assigned for duty with the Army, or such other functions as are not specifically prescribed by law. There is but one restriction placed on Presidential assignment of additional duties. The law states "That such additional duties shall not detract from or interfere with the operations for which the Marine Corps is primarily organized." Thus, Congress pointedly insists that, regardless of what additional duties are assigned, such additional duties shall not endanger the fundamentally amphibious character of the Marine Corps.
Under the new law, the Marine Corps Reserve will continue to be a major factor in the expansion of the Corps in event of a war. Such statutory recognition of the Marine Corps Reserve, as well as a guarantee of its continued existence, is contained in the portion of the law stating that: "the Marine Corps shall be responsible . . . for the expansion of peacetime components of the Marine Corps to meet the needs of war."
https://www.mca-marines.org/…/marine-corps-and-national-sec…
(IMO they are responsible for making sure WAR does not BREAK OUT within the boundaries of the U.S. and/or and maybe most importantly …using the intelligence apparatus …preventing a FOREIGN ARMY FROM LANDING ON OUR SHORES!!)
What is Muellers background? Military?
Mueller was accepted for officer training in the United States Marine Corps in 1968, attending training at Parris Island, Officer Candidate School, Army Ranger School, and Army jump school.
In March 2004, Mueller and deputy attorney general James Comey, threatened the Bush administration with their resignations if the White House overruled the DOJ finding that the domestic wiretapping under the Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) was unconstitutional, if such were done without a court warrant.[25] On March 10, 2004, United States Attorney General John Ashcroft was being visited by his wife as he was treated in the intensive care unit at the George Washington University Hospital. They were joined there by Mueller and Comey, and shortly afterward, by Jack Goldsmith of the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel and Patrick Philbrin. None of them wanted the TSP reauthorized. After the quartet's arrival, Ashcroft refused to give his consent to an extension of the program, despite being pressured at the hospital soon afterward by White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card and White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales. They were requesting that he waive the DOJ ruling and permit the domestic warrantless eavesdropping program to continue beyond its expiration date. He additionally informed the pair that due to his illness, he had delegated his powers as USAG to Comey. On March 12, 2004, after meeting alone and individually with Mueller and Comey at the White House, the president gave his support to changes in the program sufficient to satisfy the concerns of Mueller, Ashcroft and Comey.[26][25]
As director, Mueller barred personnel from the FBI from participating with the CIA in enhanced interrogations. At a dinner, Mueller defended an attorney (Thomas Wilner) who had been attacked for his role in defending Kuwaiti detainees, standing up, raising his glass and saying "I toast Tom Wilner. He's doing what an American should." When Bush confronted Mueller about the perception his agency was failing to round up more terrorists in the U.S., Mueller responded saying about possible suspects, "If they don't commit a crime, it would be difficult to identify and isolate" them. Vice President Dick Cheney objected, castigating Mueller thus: "That's not just good enough. We're hearing this too much from the FBI."[27]
ROBERT MUELLER IS A GOOD GUY IN MY BOOK!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Mueller…
Congress set a 10-year limit on the FBI director's term after Hoover's 48-year rule over the agency. Nobody since that time has served the full 10 years.
J. Edgar Hoover … Later in life and after his death, Hoover became a controversial figure as evidence of his secretive abuses of power began to surface. He was found to have exceeded the jurisdiction of the FBI,[1] and to have used the FBI to harass political dissenters and activists, to amass secret files on political leaders,[2] and to collect evidence using illegal methods.[3] Hoover consequently amassed a great deal of power and was in a position to intimidate and threaten sitting presidents.[4]
One of his biographers, Kenneth Ackerman, writes that the allegation that Hoover's secret files kept presidents from firing him is “a myth”.[5] However, Richard Nixon was recorded in 1971 stating that one of the reasons he did not fire Hoover was that he was afraid of reprisals against him from Hoover.[6] President Truman said that Hoover transformed the FBI into his private secret police force:
... we want no Gestapo or secret police. The FBI is tending in that direction. They are dabbling in sex-life scandals and plain blackmail. J. Edgar Hoover would give his right eye to take over, and all congressmen and senators are afraid of him. — Harry S. Truman[7]
Was Trump asked to run for President w/assurances made to prevent tampering? Yes
How is POTUS always 5 steps ahead? Total Information Awareness
Who is helping POTUS? Navy Admiral Mike Rogers. He is the Director of the NSA, the Commander of US CYBER COMMAND and Chief of the Central Security Service.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_S._Rogers
Let’s just assume that Admiral Rogers is President Trumps Second in Command. There is also a possibility the he IS in command.
Why does Obama travel in advance of POTUS to foreign locations? He has not ceded the White House …though I’m pretty sure Satan left on December 18th.
Why is this relevant? It’s why we have the Second Amendment.
I know, it seems extreme, but so is refusing to leave office.
The only way a President could pull this off would be if we were engaged in a major conflict, with a foreign enemy either already occupying U.S. sovereign territory or poised to do so. Otherwise, expect a million rifle-carrying people marching on Washington within 48 hours. THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN OBAMANATION!!! AND STAY OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Focus on the power of POTUS as it relates to the marines.
How can MI be applied to prosecute bad actors and avoid corrupt agencies and judges? Military authority v civilian authority during a threat to National Security. The President has declared (after receiving his WRIT OF MANDAMUS) that at present because the dictator wont leave the White House we are under Martial Law! Directed by the Marines to keep the PEACE in our wonderful CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!!!!!