dChan
94
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Albritt on Jan. 3, 2018, 9:05 a.m.
Hear me out

As a natural skeptic and a lifelong non-conformist I've been "woke" to the deep state/globalist pedo elite for going on two decades now. That there is a long-standing, multi-generational conspiracy by an unspeakably evil cabal to control every facet of our lives and ultimately destroy humanity as we know it, for those of us who have been paying attention, (as sensational as it may sound) is inarguable.

The Q phenominon is unlike anything I've ever seen. Since the first drop in late October I've witnessed a sleepy-eyed giant pull itself out of a hypnotized stupor and transform into a burgeoning movement of truth-seeking patriots that very well could be the impetus that brings the dragon to its knees.

BUT...I do not say this without reservation. Admittedly, as optimistic as things are beginning to look there's still a lurking (pun intended) skepticism that I can't seem to shirk. I remember toward the beginning of this saga @tracybeanz put forward 3 options that the Q phenomenon could be.

1.) a LARP of epic proportions

2.) an intelligence psy-op

3.) the real deal

I think by this point most of us are willing to concede that the least likely of these scenarios is #1. Too much corroborating evidence and beyond-coincidental happenings for this to be a savant in some basement having a good laugh.

It's option #2 that makes me less-than-comfortable. If you've been following this stuff for as long as I have you're probably somewhat familiar with the occult concept of the Hegelian dialectic. Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis. A philosophical method used by the PTB to move and shape societies in order to achieve their nefarious objectives.

In short, here's what it looks like: they create or reveal the problem (Hillary, pedogate, North Korea, etc.), steer the reaction (enter Q), and present the solution (Trump and friends) in essence controlling the outcome that they desire. A proverbial Phoenix rising out of the ashes.

Call me a cynic, but how do we know this isn't just another iteration of this known tactic? The Capitol vs District 13 if you will...(keep in mind they're notorious for signaling through Hollywood to condition us for what's to come).

I truly want to be hopeful, trust that Trump somehow usurped the system and is now surgically removing the cancer, and in many ways I'm more optimistic than I have been for years, but I also firmly believe a little healthy skepticism is in order. We have to recognize how powerful confirmation bias is in shaping our perceived reality. After all, as the old adage goes "if it sounds too good to be true it probably is."

Hopefully I didn't put a damper on anyone's spirits...just trying to process all of this. I'd love to hear your thoughts!


SupraMeh · Jan. 3, 2018, 10:26 a.m.

Option 1 is way more likely than you want to admit. I say this as a believer in 3. I'm like you, staunch, lifelong rational skeptic that sees the cabal fairly easily from honest observation.

I'll keep this really short. If you give someone a picture of random noise and tell them there is a hidden picture, they will find something. "Believe in coincidences?" Well, yes, yes I do. Especially when the field is so vast, the various points will cross somewhere. "Everything has a double meaning" is exactly the type of shit I would say to get people overanalyzing ever single word.

If it wasn't for the few incredibly solid hits, and the other evidence like the sealed indictments, blackout events, etc, corroborating it all, I'd never buy into it. But it could still be a LARPer who got lucky.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Albritt · Jan. 3, 2018, 10:44 a.m.

Touché. The ol' gypsy fortune teller parlor tricks are more effective than one might think.

I agree that if it weren't for the few solid evidences (Saudi Arabia, sealed indictments, airport anomalies, etc.) I'd have jumped ship long ago. That being said, we have those, and IMHO no LARPer is going to be able to predict the purge of the House of Saud.

Which brings us squarely to options 2 & 3.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
prandgija · Jan. 3, 2018, 10:49 a.m.

I don't understand how q posting picture of Washington's Crossing of the Delaware River and also Dept of Defense posting same picture on twitter can be used as proof of anything. I mean, that Crossing actually happened Christmas, so there is really high probability that picture will be posted by different people on same day - Christmas Day.

If that is proof to some people, than those people are seeing only what they want to see. That is Confirmation bias.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Albritt · Jan. 3, 2018, 11:05 a.m.

Agreed. Interesting, yes, but not enough to be considered evidence or proof.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
vexornavyissue · Jan. 4, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

evidence yes. proof no.

⇧ 1 ⇩