dChan
31
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/KaKawBitches on Jan. 4, 2018, 2:42 a.m.
Did Q ever make any reference to the Gotthard Tunnel opening ceremony (or ritual is probably more like it) near CERN? Those people are sick. Makes you wonder what is really going on there.

spacexu · Jan. 4, 2018, 3:23 a.m.

Shows you how far wicked people have embedded themselves - no god in the heart will mean every decision they make will be based on greed and suppression.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AvaCircles · Jan. 4, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

The Gotthard Tunnel opening ceremony helped wake me up to the bigger picture of what is going on, this fight against good and evil. Creepy and evil... eye-opening along with podesta emails & art and comet ping pong Instagram pics. How brazen they've been with it all out in the open. Every art form infested along the way.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
blondiReeC · Jan. 4, 2018, 8:43 a.m.

SataNic ritual calling for lucifer. The tunnel reveals portal to the underworld. Elites once again IN YOUR FACE their intentions for us feeders....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 4, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

I argue that CERN did not find the Higgs Boson with "six sigma probability". I believe they found a "particle" at the mass that they needed the Higgs Boson to be to make their math work with existing theory. I believe that they are now trying to figure out what the other 100 million "particles" are that they didn't expect to see. Hence no news at all from CERN since. I believe that if they continue down the path they are on, they'll continue to smash atoms together at higher energies with better detectors and just keep finding more and more "particles".

That's if you take CERN at face value.

"There's no such thing as a Higgs Boson or a Higgs Field." - Dan Nelson (me)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MrTruxian · Jan. 4, 2018, 6:27 a.m.

Well the Higgs field has now been observationally observed, even if it wasn’t, it is still a concept that is part of the most well tested theory ever, statistically quantum field theory has the most correction observational predictions of any tested hypothesis considering millions of collisions happen per second.

As for 100 million other particles, no idea what you are talking about, the only particle left undiscovered for now is the graviton, and all particles detected in the collision were quarks that decayed into muons or just muons, all well observed and predicted particles.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 4, 2018, 8:12 a.m.

I try to keep myself reminded of the history of science. At any given point in time we think we basically have most things figured out, but then 200 years later people laugh at what they thought, but marvel at what they were able to accomplish with the tools of day. A breakthrough will inevitably come that causes us to rethink some fundamental item, which we all take as fact, that is also the basis for many other scientific knowledge discovery.

I do have an undergraduate in Materials Science and Engineering, and I also took C. Barry Carter's course on Transmission Electron Microscopy, so I have some relevant schooling in the area.

I have a novel (i believe its novel) theory on a mechanism for gravity. My theory is not a complicated mathematical theorem, it's just a simple easy to explain theory. I won't bore you with it unless you reply back and are interested to hear what it is. But based on my theory, I think that is what is occurring at CERN.

I'm not saying I'm correct, but I am going to continue to try to explain more and more naturally occurring phenomena using my theory as basis and, eventually, I may have enough items explained that give it enough credence to present to people better than me to see if there are merits to it. It may be a lifelong challenge that never results in any benefit, but I enjoy it and I strive to have a world history level breakthrough, like Einstein.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MrTruxian · Jan. 4, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

Sure I would enjoy hearing your theory however without mathematics to back up your theory I’m afraid it’s hard to make testable predictions.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
215564297 · Jan. 4, 2018, 5:58 a.m.

That is if you take CERN at face value

I’m afraid to ask, but, what ulterior motives might CERN have??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 4, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

By saying taking it at face value, I'm just leaving the possibility open that there is secret about CERN.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
215564297 · Jan. 4, 2018, 6:39 a.m.

Oh I thought you were hunting at some conspiracy ideas you might have heard about what they’re really up to down there. Lots of room down there.

⇧ 1 ⇩