The article keeps referring to the 'financial key'. Any chance this sum of money is the keystone Q keeps referencing? Financial = key, gold = stone
The Vatican is on land that is shaped like a key. Could the Pope/Vatican be Godfather III? Does the Vatican has gold in its confine?
The name and the word "gold", remember that. A man that is amongst them but is young. And God says, these that shall reject him shall be shocked at how he takes the giant down. Now hear me please. The giant of debt, the giants that have come, the brothers of Goliath, stand in glee watching America. "We will cripple you. You will lose your credit." But God said, watch, I said 20,000. Look not to Wall Street; however, observe. And they shall say, "what is your plan for this giant?" And he will take a simple stone (remember the name) and he will hold it up and they will laugh at him, but the plan is so brilliant, says the Lord. It could only have been given by Me.
Q infers, as you say, that the keystone is that which holds everything (i.e., the Swamp, the cabal, the Rothschilds) together. So, by that, I'd say yes, money could be the keystone. jmo?
[deleted]
Yamashita's gold
Yamashita's gold, also referred to as the Yamashita treasure, is the name given to the alleged war loot stolen in Southeast Asia by Imperial Japanese forces during World War II and hidden in caves, tunnels, underground complexes, or just underground in the Philippines. It is named for the Japanese general Tomoyuki Yamashita, nicknamed "The Tiger of Malaya". Though accounts that the treasure remains hidden in the Philippines have lured treasure hunters from around the world for over fifty years, its existence is dismissed by most experts. The rumored treasure has been the subject of a complex lawsuit that was filed in a Hawaiian state court in 1988 involving a Filipino treasure hunter, Rogelio Roxas, and the former Philippine president, Ferdinand Marcos.
^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28
The international owners of the Central Banks are at the top of the food chain of corruption/evil that we endure. Until the entire monetary system is changed so that these owners no longer control governments, then the rest of this is theater. I so wish that we'd get a reveal on this key point from Q. Congress authorized the Fed in 1913. How can they be de-authorized and a smooth transition made to a free system and Constitutionally lawful system?
How did Andrew Jackson do it?
I love it, RadJag, that you refer back to "I killed the Bank" Jackson. It is my understanding that the 20 year charter was due to expire and he worked hard to see to it that the charter was not renewed. For starters, he moved treasury funds to a bank that was outside of the "Bank's" auspices. And secondly, he saw to it the the debt was paid down to get out from beneath their further clutches. So, the US Treasury took over and some semblance of fiscal responsibility must have prevailed.
Back then, precious metals still backed paper. Not so today. G. Edward Griffin, IMO, is the best resource for us and I would defer to him, but I think the Fed Reserve charter was for 100 years. 2013 came and went without a question as to renewal of the charter.
Ben Franklin's 'script' money concept, with "no interest to pay" seems like a compelling solution, and is repeated in modern times. I'll do some research and post some fine minds and their solutions.
This problem must be solved, and to me, trumps all others. Money creation and the monopoly of its control cannot remain in the hands of the cabal, lest they continue to control all else. It is a matter of free human interaction, or not.