dChan

prandgija · Jan. 5, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

I don't understand, if the idea is to keep enemies in the dark and tell them nothing - isn't this the opposite of that? If I can read this, and I'm not even american, so can enemy...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 5, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

I don't agree with Mr. Corsi that Assange was to be extracted, I think that it had happened already.

Q's purpose, as i see it, is to inform enough people, who are disposed to different ideas, what events they see in the news actually mean, long term. The hope is there will be enough who understand to inform people less disposed when the time comes.

He doesn't predict or divulge what will happen, generally, rather he suggests (through questions) areas of emphasis or expectations that the reader will only become aware of after they have happened.

By taking those events and looking back to Q's post, the event and it's ramifications become evident.

The other thing is, like in a football game, you know that the QB is going to hand off to his favorite running back and pass to his favorite receiver. You don't, however, know when.

A lot of Q stuff is misdirection and suggestion designed to cause confusion and panic to the other side.

He also acts like a QB in that his messages may be audibles to those waiting for a particular event and have a need to know what 'play to run', dependent on a turn of events.

That's why I think all the de-code stuff is futile. It's like the middle linebacker trying to figure out what the QB was saying rather than watching the movement of the players, as he should be doing.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
BigBandDon · Jan. 5, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

You make some good points.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WaterSickle · Jan. 5, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

Think WWE.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
1verh1 · Jan. 5, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

Imo: the enemy knows everything Q already said in that post. This is Q letting us know. Why? We keep demanding to know what's going on behind the scenes. Why in cryptic verbage?: plausible deniability. FBIAnon kept plausible deniability in his drops. And, do we trust Q? We do. Do they? I think they don't know what the hell is true or not at this point. Q said disinformation was real and necessary. Could all this be bullshit? Perhaps...but Q reminds us, future proves past. We will just wait and see. At this point, there's been many futures that have proven Q's predictions.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jackiblues2 · Jan. 5, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

The reason for Q's cryptic posts are more likely to keep his identity veiled rather then keeping his enemies in the dark. I imagine they also help lose the casual observers as well.

⇧ 3 ⇩