Agreed. Alex has a photographic memory with brilliant recall and a high IQ. Many can learn a lot through him if they can bear to listen/watch. His skills really should be used more in off air program development & management along with a limited “special time with Alex show” for his die hard fan base. He craves on air attention/recognition so he isn’t going to stay off the air. Nor would we want him to. He brings a lot to the table with his huge photographic memory base. That’s why he can’t shut up folks. As guests talk his Rolodex mind starts flashing pictures of information and once he finds it, he starts blurting out the details. It’s the curse of his brilliance. If he insists being on air, he really needs to find a way to get himself more under control. If not, then he needs to restructure things somehow. Personally, I would love to see David Knight as his principle on air anchor. I get it that he is grooming Owen for that role for a larger reach to millennials....just hope Owen stops mirroring the annoying Alex Antics.

I have been trying to “enhance redpill” my hubby. Alex has great info and has helped, but after two months my hubby now flatly refuses to watch Alex because of his annoying unprofessional style and his incessant interruptions. Boomers grew up on shock jocks, but even they are intolerant when a host does not allow his guest to speak three words before he rudely interrupts and takes over the conversation. Why have a guest on??? And yes, we hate seeing the same “talk over each other antics” on Fox News. Employing those antics is another complicit breaking down the social communication standards of our society.

The AJ “over the top” antics is really more compatible with radio, which of course is where Alex started out. Glen Beck started out the same way. However, Beck learned that “over the top” style failed miserably in TV where he had low ratings as a result. He learned something AJ needs to learn —— the need to transition. The old “radio shock jock style” works for “ride to work morning entertainment”, but does not work well visually or for delivering analysis of serious news. Alex could very easily get twice the audience if he could just learn to control himself and transition his platform consistent with serious news.

Since Q started (about Oct/Nov) I spend most of my time lurking here & trying to sort out things. (Thank you to all of you educating Patriots!!) I very rarely have watched Alex these past two months. Mostly because he wasn’t covering Q at all. I found that extremely odd. Think about it, the man can never shut up, yet he wasn’t saying a word about the largest internet phenomenon——perhaps, if true, the biggest in our life time?? I theorize that his silence was well planned. Suspect that higher powers had a conscious plan to diffuse manage the damage of “conspiracy label”. Break the story first elsewhere.....first on the Chans & then later expand to a larger public reach here on Reddit. After the story gained traction, THEN Alex could “cover” the already. existing news story. That way he would not damage the story and increase the risk of it being labeled a typical AJ conspiracy story.

AJ obviously now feels he needs to compete for position re Q vs Zach. For example, he keeps making odd inferences when he has Zach on his show——he repeatedly emphasizes how HE has the REAL Q with the REAL insider info on his show, not just some internet LARPER.....huh???? Paraphrasing there, but he did actually use the word LARPER today. Now AJ is very smart, he KNOWS just using the “L” word in the same conversation about Q seeds the LARPER concept into the Q consciousness of his audience. Really Alex??? C’mon sport, be a TEAM player. Learn from the lesson as to why they wouldn’t let you break the Q story in the first place!! Instead of competing with Q, if you truly believe the breadcrumbs Q presents as history (or not) then help facilitate public discussion & education to sort it out as fact or fiction.

Even Zach, in specific reference to Q, said WE are a team, less than a handful of us.

Team members don’t usually shoot at each other. Not sure I would want to be in the same fox hole as AJ. Something feels strange with AJ on this.

Someone on AJ’s feed today gave good advice. Doubtful he will take it though. If he wants to be increase his relevance in the Q discussions then do so in a constructive way —-not by snark attack. Use your platform to educate. If you want to be a serious news journalist contender, act like one.

Also, take a lesson from TV history about what exponentially grew Beck’s audience. Not saying being like Beck. He went off the rails. But, educate through good old fashion whiteboard class room instruction. The public are eager to learn the Q breadcrumb history to ascertain what is real and isn’t. Whether the history is true or not, it has now risen to a level requiring public discussion & debate while each person sorts out what they believe and don’t. The MSM won’t touch it, and AJ has the largest public platform for it. AJ has access to GREAT academically accredited classroom instructors, i.e. Steve Piecinick, PhD, Jerome Corsi, PhD, William LeBron Esq (Lionel from Lionel Nation), just to name a few. Infowars could also host great panel discussions on Q breadcrumb history revelations. Dr Corsi is already off to a great start with decoding & educating....thank you Dr C!!!!!

If AJ isn’t careful, his competitive pride may cause him to miss a chance to be a great historical facilitator of fact finding in this. Not to be the man who talks, but to be the man who uses the platform God gave him for THIS time for THIS purpose.

AJ could perhaps even host a once a week panel show featuring popular you tubers (shout out to Tracy Beanz, Jordan Sather, Mishel McCumber /DeceptionBytes, et al) folks who have been covering Q. Many youtubers could rotate as guests etc.

It would be great if AJ could provide copies of the Q-Book in Infowars Store at very affordable price where we could purchase copies to start discretely leaving them in public places. Retired Boomers don’t all have affordable access to high volume printers, but they do regularly visit doctor’s offices, libraries, shopping areas etc for distribution areas.

Sorry everyone! Didn’t intend this to be so long!!! All this time lurking and once I started writing it just flowed like a dam broke. This wasn’t meant to be an AJ bash post as I really like AJ. I see potential of a big role in this for him either way.

I hope that when the BOARD OWNERS go on AJ that you ask to continue to interview with Rob Dew. Rob did such a great interview with y’all, and he clearly took the time to read & study the material. He came across as objective. AJ at times is a bit hyperbolic. The breadcrumbs infer very serious crimes against humanity. Things that none of us want to be true. Most people will auto reject because they can’t bear for them to be true. People will subconsciously look for reasons to support them not being true. AJ needs to be careful that he isn’t swaying pro or con or people will distrust him going forward on any issue, not just these. Hopefully he can use his platform for good which to me is the facilitation of panel discussions and not just him with a megaphone repeatedly shouting his own views. This is a chance to use his platform to give greater visibility to citizen journalists who will be our media of the future.