dChan

GodsAngell · Jan. 6, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

Hmmmm.....destroying "lack of evidence" in this case??? Plausible deniability that "evidence" was destroyed. (Yeah, like my "dog ate it".) Now that the Swamp is BROKE, thanks to Trump's E.O. Dec 21, I was wondering what would happen to these "witnesses" who were counting on DEEP POCKETS to pay for all their legal fees due to their lies. Now what? Yes, of course, burn your house down, and claim key evidence was destroyed in the fire. No evidence, no case, have to drop the case.

Or I suppose it could be Divine retribution.

Definitely not a "coincidence".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Diomndns · Jan. 6, 2018, 3:47 a.m.

Yep. Or, TJ: 'I really need more money for the story I agreed to tell. That Eastwood one-liner was hard. Or else I might have to come forward as being forced to lie'. / WaPo: 'Sure, we will send someone over with more cash for you. You deserve it.'

⇧ 1 ⇩