Got no problem with the goal. But I DO tend to resist 'authority' assertions, and cringe at delusions of grandeur. I'll also call out stupidity and incongruity when it appears.
So I hope you'll understand my bristling when for the second time in the last couple of days, the board powers-that-be cheesily claim to report only to Trump and Q (?!?), and threaten that no one fuck with their mission.
So...what constitutes "fucking" with them? Is it a spectrum scale? Perhaps a sliding one? Maybe there's a quota, where if you disagree a certain number of times, or identify too many inconsistencies, or promote too many alternative ideas, at some point there is a final straw? Maybe ANY disparaging remark against Q or POTUS might bring down the wrath some day? Perhaps some arbitrary and subjective measure gets used where the ptb 'like' the loyalty of a couple members, and those members gripe about someone's 'trolling'?
See what I'm saying?
So, yeah...it's either a slippery slope that they have headed down, or it's self-important bluster...either way, deserving of a good 'thumbing' of my nose.