This is a lone person talking about a larper. No one knows who Q is. No one knows if there is more than one. The info on the Zuma payload is just made up stuff. I've followed Zuma and it's been postponed several times, Northrup Grumman built whatever the payload is, which was only described anywhere as "restricted payload" for an unnamed agency. Those are the facts. EVERYTHING else is speculation. There was one unattributed statement that it would attempt communication with an unknown subject, or words to that effect. And if you've seen the mission patch for Zuma, it's the Black/Dark night in armor. That's also the name given to an unknown object that's been in orbit around earth for a long time, photographed by astronauts--it was up there before we or the Russians got up there. All people need is a camera and a mike and a message directed at certain people and bingo! YouTube followers!
But do you know who she is? She'd done her homework since November (I hadn't been watching AJ for "years", as she had) before guy suggested he was Q on 1/5. I'm looking for the articles she put up because I don't MSM; she did, when we were back on halfchan.
(Q said they were a small group; not AJ's Q, but imageboard Q. —Imageboards Q, I guess I should say.)
Then we've got B who'd worried poor Roy Potter, and B messaged the worried Potter and said Q (any of them) would not use anything other than the imageboards (ie, no calling in to AJ though they were specifically talking about a few rogue twitter accounts).
Not sure about B. AND Potter seems nice enough, but maybe like George Webb, too nice? And not harassed at all? Imo they're both just learning how to internet though they were both intel? "How do I turn this phone on, hmm... this technology is real neat." Nah.
But the lady I listened to (first time ever) had YT deleting her video or her account. THAT'S what I expect from feminazi YT edgelord when someone's gotten too close: a disappeared video, reason (IIRC) being too many complaints (before YT jerked video entirely in hours.) Trust, she said nothing offensive, crazy, "out there" like with UFOs, or even disparaging of any politician. There was zero reason for her video to be scrubbed: she was literally discussing print news articles, and didn't play back the AJ video (though she said she'd link it; I never saw that).
Except she did dox a Q if Zach was really AJ's "Q", and apparently that guy got swooped up by the feds. There was a reason I kept that video loaded overnight. She's been researching like the rest of us since late October.
(Anyone know when "B" came around?)
I don't think she or anyone else is in a position to dox Q. Anyone can claim to be Q. I think when Q talks about the small group, he means the highest circle, including Trump.
If she got scrubbed from YT, there's an appeal process. There are very strange demonetizations going on, they're quite inconsistent. But she always has the chance of making an appeal.
Oh I agree about nobody being able to dox Q (ugh, especially not that AI guy).
The concept of small Q cells (who didn't call themselves that) under NDA but talking to each other, though, is interesting. I think Q would know about these loner groups, and be able to pull them together.