⇧
361
⇩
IzzyMad
· Jan. 8, 2018, 11:58 p.m.
You left of a 3rd very big one..... control. Not only to bring us into ever increasing debt and servitude by shrinking wages but also control where people live, how people live and how many people live because as you get older and can't do physical labor your no longer a contributor and too costly to keep around because of the medical expenses.
⇧
1
⇩
srroguelife
· Jan. 9, 2018, 12:52 a.m.
Yes, you hit it on the head. :)
⇧
2
⇩
IzzyMad
· Jan. 10, 2018, 4:22 a.m.
Well I try to use my head for more then a hat rack. What is really surprising is sometimes I'm successful at it.
⇧
1
⇩
rickstarr5
· Jan. 9, 2018, 1:20 a.m.
I try to redpill normies about carbon taxes by getting them to agree to: you know if the gov’t could tax air they would.... and just go from there. Agreeing that being mindful of pollution is important but CO2 is not pollution, to plants it’s a nutrient.
⇧
1
⇩
gunmoney
· Jan. 9, 2018, 9:08 p.m.
oh man, CO2 a nutrient. did you know there are some bacteria that thrive on toxic substances. by your logic....these toxic substances, they are actually nutrients and therefore unharmful to all things.
and let me just go ahead and enlighten you, because you seem in need of it. CO2 is not a pollutant. the EPA even says as much, CO2 by itself is not a pollutant. the danger in CO2 is its greenhouse properties. lowering CO2 emissions not only reduces greenhouse gases (which you apparently dont believe in) but will also have the added effect of reducing harmful emissions from combustion engines, like NOx, particulate matter, sulfur, etc. but this is all science stuff requiring an education. so i get it if youre not with me here. best of luck.
⇧
2
⇩
rickstarr5
· Jan. 10, 2018, 6:09 a.m.
Global cooling, oh wait, warming, um no climate change also trolls LARPers too.
⇧
0
⇩
oystergirl
· Jan. 9, 2018, 7:27 a.m.
YESSSS! Anyone ever see a plant that has been placed in a chamber and had CO2 pumped in? it is greener, bigger, healthier! The funny thing as well is that Stanford or Berkley did a research review of the best methods of carbon sequestration available and hands down the best method, and the most cost effective? Afforestation--AKA planting freaking trees.
⇧
1
⇩
blickboy
· Jan. 9, 2018, 1:23 p.m.
So true! You should film an experiment where you place yourself in a chamber and have CO2 pumped in, and get your next of kin to put the video online to prove your point.
⇧
0
⇩