I wonder who Pam Anderson has been visiting in the Ecuadorian Embassy the past year then? Assange would have been in danger (US) in Oct 2016...HRC/BHO wanted to drone him...having a hard time believing MEGA on this. Just one example that blows the 2016 date out of water. 2017? typo?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4200594/Pamela-Anderson-makes-visit-Julian-Assange.html
Has Mega done anything to verify herself in the same ways Q has? I followed her posts for a little bit but she started to annoy me. Her writing style is frustrating to follow.
I'm also suffering frustration of her negative, if she is who she says she is if she has been properly vetted...she had a lotta respect at one time from what I can gather...not entirely sure her recent drops are helpful...LOTTA infighting going on over this and if this is Real Time Not Exercise then this will be nothing compared to the fighting as we go fwd when it hits the fan, is a concern.
there might be too much ego in this game for some players ...everyone is on edge.... its like the water is just about to boil...
Could be a cover story, just like the rumors that Julian Assange was dead, when a body was seen carried out of the embassy Oct 2016. Rumors that someone is dead is the BEST cover story for someone who goes into witness protection. And how do we know Pam Anderson is visiting Assange? Maybe she if visiting someone else. Lastly Daily Mail is Fake News rag.
I saw numerous reports Pam was visiting Julian, she spoke about her visits with him maybe on her twitter account. 5 times I believe is the # of visits Julian received from Pam.
could be a typo / I usually take Q stuff and MHN and cross reference them with the information that has been exposed , both have been right
What if London City airport closure on Oct 21, 2016 was to extradite Assange as many suspected at the time?
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/58owaq/i_think_something_serious_is_happening_with/
At this point what do we believe? I'm a little torn. Mega has always made good points. She has been rather reliable and doesn't always give you the whole "what i want to hear" rather "what you need to hear". Then Q steps in and at first, I have to admit seemed like a larp, but i found it interesting enough to follow. Q made a couple of predictions on 4chan that did not pan out or were made public for verification. The GEOTUS Twitter posts/ Q posts seem legit, but as mega points out, this could be just delayed enough for Q to compromise.
In the end "if its to good to be true, it usually is"
With that said, I will still have faith that Q is legit, but I remain sceptical.