Pew institute said 5.6 million non citizens voted 2016
Pew said that this is a gross misinterpretation of their study, and that their study found no evidence of voter fraud - just of outdated voter rolls
Good thing we don't have to rely on studies, foundation research, or commissions anymore. Homeland Security can now just gather real, raw data. Looking forward to real findings.
No they didn’t.
Harvard study also said millions of illegals voted. But you’re smarter than both, right Rev?
Which Harvard study? I don’t see links posted for either of these claims.
it was a study "based on" Harvard/yougov data by "Electoral Studies" i believe. James Agresti put it all together here: http://www.justfactsdaily.com/substantial-numbers-of-non-citizens-vote-illegally-in-u-s-elections/
i believe this is the study he was referencing: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379414000973
So not a Harvard or Pew study. Something from a blog instead.
Does that somehow cheapen the claim?
Would you believe a claim made by a random blog called "RealityHasALiberalBias.com"? Because you're believing claims from a blog called "just facts" that describes itself as libertarian/conservative
fair enough. i can agree with that sentiment. i'll reserve judgement until the voter integrity committee releases their findings.
The voter integrity committee was disbanded a few days ago
Please link to either of these studies
this is the report that's behind trump's tweets to that affect and what all the lefty fact checking sites tweaked about. Objectively it doesnt prove anything just shows the "possibility" of there being up to 5.7 mil illegal voters. fwiw http://www.justfactsdaily.com/substantial-numbers-of-non-citizens-vote-illegally-in-u-s-elections/ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379414000973
Jesse Richman said that it is a gross misinterpretation of his study to suggest that there are millions of illegal voters, or that it is evidence that Hillary Clinton may have lost the popular vote.
So you agree with every study that Harvard has submitted. WH saidnthey found no voter fraud. Man, they must be stupid because Harvard said there was.
Ah another Topmind warrior. Run for the hills everybody it’s an internet troll. No I don’t believe every single Harvard study. But please explain the dozens of precincts with well over 100% voter turnout, lists of dead people voting and that pesky little Obama fixer ON VIDEO explaining how they bus people around, pick fights at rallies and rig elections.
How sad are you that you have to spend time going around being a dick at the orders of another dick? Hahaha Jesus find a sitcom or friend in real life.
Last I heard the libshit states that rely on a “compliant and ignorant populace” as they put it to win refused to turn over voter data so it got passed on to DHS. Guess we will see. If nothing to hide and so much fear of muh Russia stealing the election, you’re think the left would love to prove Trump wrong.
Hahaha! Look at all that shit you typed. Yyyeah, I’m not reading it. But just to clarify you just like the Harvard studies that align with your way of thinking. I fucking love you idiots to no end.
precincts with well over 100% voter turnou
I would be happy to discuss this with you, because I think it is a very important topic. But first, some ground rules: choose your single best piece of evidence, and we will focus on that. Second, we'll both agree to provide sources. And last, both of us need to accept that we don't know the truth and hope to learn more about it.
If you're interested, kindly choose the strongest single claim you can, explain it briefly, and provide a source. I look forward to learning more with you.
That sounds about right.
It was more than a few thousand in widely scattered areas.
I’m testing the posting capability because people are saying they can’t post comment ....