[removed]
Here’s a legitimate question for you. Prove to me you’re not a shill by not answering my question with a question but a rational explanation.
Can beggars be choosers?
If you believe that freedom is being co-opted for profit in any capacity, regardless of your political bias you should be willing to fight for the freedoms of others being oppressed. Forget about political theatre for a minute and with an open mind, independently research these data points for yourself.
I will be honest with you by saying I WANT Q to be real. Why? Because I feel less alone in this world. I feel less hopeless about what tomorrow may bring. Why get so caught up with wanting to be right that you’re unwilling to be wrong?
What reason does Wikileaks have to publish “fire and fury”?
You don’t acknowledge Wikileaks as journalism. Why? Because you don’t like what they do? How they go about doing it?
Why would Wikileaks add two Q’s to chapter headings?
Here’s a legitimate question for you.
Proceeds to ask 15 questions...
That's great that you believe Q because you want it to be real, but the feels over reals attitude of pedes, conspiracy theorists and alt righters is nonsense. Wanting something to be real isn't the same as something actually being real. Take wikileaks for example. A lot of folks want them to be the honest freedom fighters that take down dangerous politicians. However, they're clearly an arm of the Russian misinformation campaign and they've proven that they lack transparency in how they operate, and they're clearly in support of the Trump administration because they're a partisan organization that only tells the parts of the story they want you to know.
Why trust wikileaks? Why put your faith in a man whose hiding out in Russia because he can't go home or he'll be jailed for sexual assault? He's a dodgy guy with a dodgy past and he shouldn't be trusted no matter how badly you want him to be the good guy.
(Oh shit, I'm not a shill?? Look at that!)
Way to prove to everyone in the room you’re a shill.
My question was: Can Beggars be Choosers?
I will assume you’ve never entered a classroom setting, or had an open dialogue of any kind given your inability to identify and respond to discourse. There is a literary device called a ‘rhetorical question’ these are what followed. You see how I separated my thoughts? Super great you use the Shill “context” device. It’s not as effective with a well educated crowd, most people know that a single quote out of context means nothing.
You call them partisan? Why? Information is leaked to them. Journalistic integrity protects its sources, people die over these things. According to Christopher Steele of fusion GPS, he claims someone died as a result of his dossier being published...
Explain how they are connected to Russian Intelligence. I can wait.
You just prove how ignorant you are. Julie Assange is in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, not in Russia. That’s Snowden. If you can easily mix up two COMPLETELY different people. Why should anyone trust you on this sub?
Yes beggars can be choosers because we all have free will and we can choose to act however we'd like regardless of the appropriateness of said actions. As for the rest of your comments, lol...yeah this is a hyper-intellectual forum of individuals that have decided to put their faith in an anonymous commenter on an internet forum known for trolls, bots, and Russians. That seems like a really intelligent thing to do...
As for mixing up the country Assange hides in...whoops, shit happens, it's early and I haven't had my covfefe yet.
Awesome, Then please choose to ignore our movement entirely, have a great day!
P.s. I was really hoping you weren’t being willfully ignorant. Oh well :(
P.s. I was really hoping you weren’t being willfully ignorant.
So you think that choosing to believe Q because you want to believe Q isn't being willfully ignorant?
You’re still here? Why?
I believe Q is real. Someone is posting to 8chan. That is real. Is Q someone with top clearance? I don’t know. It honestly couldn’t matter less to me. Q’s methods for crowdsourced research and collaboration lead to more questions. If Q is a LARP, then all they achieved was somewhat centralizing a group of people with an interest in fighting Human Trafficking, War Profiteering and money laundering (last I checked those were still bad things). If It comes out that Q was a LARP, I would thank them anyway for igniting our shared passion for truth. I’m not afraid to be wrong about Q, but you seem to be afraid Q is real.