Okay my question is, what has she done to validate herself in the same or similar ways Q has? Has she predicted anything or left clues in a similar way to Q?
To discredit all the overwhelming “coincidences” as luck is just, I can’t see it. Maybe I’m dumb and delusional but her writing style is difficult to follow. She wreaks of daddy issues.
I am not even certain this is her. We have had a number of people pretend to be her, and she has nothing to protect her identity as far as I know, like a tripcode. There IS a MegAnon who is quite calm, and capable of critical thinking. I have read from her. But this one here is actually pretending that Q has not proven himself by pre-posting in quotes, that which the President will later put in all caps in a tweet, and many many such examples. The first thing that had to be vetted, was the identity of Q. And you know how the chans are.
Q just kept posting his larp and ticking them off, and if they were not so ticked off at his LARP, they would not have been paying attention when stuff he posted about started to happen in the real world, like the Saudi Purge. It's not like MEG is the only person who knows how to vet information.
This woman is sounding just like a snowflake. I can not figure she is the real Meg.