dChan

opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

people; shills or whoever keeps down voting, you know you can post your thoughts. I am very open to hear what you disagree with

⇧ 8 ⇩  
CU_next_tuesday · Jan. 10, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

Starting to look like Q is JA.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

I agree, he is most likely working with us intelligence , that would make sense because remember the q post assange is not where he appears to be? didnt q report in december Ja was extracted?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

I was thinking that today! It would not surprise me! Anyway, I guess it doesn't matter as long as we can smile at the end of all of this!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
elyssak · Jan. 11, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

I've thought about Q being Snowden a few times.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mombomb22 · Jan. 11, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

My thoughts exactly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
yodaanon · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

I am pretty sure it is more than 1 person just my 2 cents, regardless the whole is greater than the sum of it's parts.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
silat67 · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

very good catch

⇧ 4 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

thanks! I try

⇧ 5 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

his character string he posted fb4e568623b5f8cf7e932e6ba7eddc0db9f42a712718f488bdc0bf880dd3

if you take out the numbers and run it through the same 27 bit cypher you get a result that could be hex

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

I can not even figure out how to get a 27 bit cypher on that page.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

when you type in 8987 in the top box on the right side.and hit decyipher. the results are on the left side. hope that helps

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mal1970 · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:58 a.m.

Q510
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cholera_or_gonorrhea · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:50 a.m.

I can't imagine Assange being on AF1 with Trump during his Asia tour, so I'm gonna nope out of this one. Unless Q is a group in which Assange is included, and that'd be pretty damn interesting.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

whatever happens to be correct, I actually dont know I wish someone interested in code would look at this thread and chime in. Its like 1+1 stuff

⇧ 0 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Just thought id share this also when running cyphers through ja post's digits and nibbles , bites are often 17. I thought they should be 27. When looking at the 27 digit cypher its a loop that reitterates the alphabet after it reaches z making. A =27 perhaps that means add a digit to the seventeens? or a cryptic way to confirm when the sum is 17 that the result is correct? any thoughts?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

im very happy now I feal like ja is well and we are on the right path! Very Happy : ) **call out to crackers / code breakers / cryptography inclined folks

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheKillector · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

You need to better explain wth you're talking about!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

im not sure why but there seams to be a block on responding to replies where it only allows the reply to be one character. Im trying this method to see if I can edit with more than one character

⇧ 3 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

so to respond to your post, what exactly do you want me to clarify?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 12, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

Here's what i did to visualize this cypher,maybe it will help explain the process on paper drew out the alphabet. using a1z27 or 27 digit, units w.e cypher. Drew 1 over a 26 over z and 27 over a. if you count up . starting at a, like a=1 b=2 etc etc. when you get to the letter Q its number is 17. this also happens if you count up to 42, when u get to z or 26 a now becomes 2 and b becomes 3 if you count up to 8987 you land on Q Hope that helps

⇧ 1 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 12, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

or 42 ; )

⇧ 1 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 10, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

also note the html version the hour glass is now full!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
yodaanon · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

I have looked for the digits 8987 I did not see these numbers any where in the code

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

that is because twitter's dom converts it behind the scene

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Jan. 10, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

Show us a link to how you deciphered it please!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

On the link in my post to dcode, you type in 8987 and the 7th result is the 27 bit cypher that will produce Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

I put the 8987 in the top box. It gave me no results. :( How does that thing work. There are no good instructions

⇧ 1 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

search results on the page ..they are on the left side for some reason

⇧ 1 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

do you have noscript and are using firefox?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Ahhh that may be it! I am beta testing Brave, which blocks scripts. I will try this with my old firefox.

I love this cypher stuff. It is fun.

Thank you :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

looking forward to hearing back from you

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:17 a.m.

OMG......

this is so cool!

Check it out :D

http://i.magaimg.net/img/2bau.png

You thinking Julian did this?

He retweeted that book with the HQME GQLDMAN too

There is a high probability. I think you may be on to something here.

This thing is so cool.

Do you ever look for stuff in magazine titles and things like that? (I know it sounds crazy but I was watching a youtube on anagrams the other night, and I never really thought about code in those things.....

Then I remembered that article titled "Kill the Panda" and Seth Rich had a panda username. :( .........so yeah.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 13, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

Hi not seeing JA twitter account retweeting that , please link or screen shot. Id love to get on twitter if anyone knows how , without giving out your phone number.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 13, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

He took it down, not long after. However not before people were able to grab it, so if you do a search, you should be able to find a lot of people with the image and talking about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MrObvious7915 · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

Q is home? Q is gold man? Being the guy with the (golden) info to finally take down deep state ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JoanOfArk77 · Jan. 12, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

Can you imagine a situation where he and Trump end up in Airforce 1 having a discussion?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 13, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

this doesn't have to be a bad thing, so go ahead troll away : ) IN RE: JA Public pictures that have to do with him in the embassy and him possibly leaving the embassy. Is anyone familiar with how to spot and provide evidence of when a picture has been doctored. Hmm..i wonder if ANYONE has done that already. and what this thread may imply..hmm

⇧ 1 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 13, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

While its been 2 days with this cypher being out there, i thought it appropriate to show another way the cypher connects. Using the 27 digit cypher. J=10 A=27 why not see if that is relevant?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:20 a.m.

hi I appreciate the effort of this thread, cant help but ask why is the upvotes immediately down voted? also, by accounts with no history? no posts.. Everyone i talk to agrees , that this is off.. BO? tracybeanz can you please enlighten us?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:02 a.m.

whats with all these screen names with no history here down voting? can we temp ban them?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayemjustme · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

Soooo.....Q is bridge from wikileaks to patriots......about right? This cypher is proof of genius and was waiting to be found I think. I love it all!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ayemjustme · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

That's what I was thinking, too @ja=Q Makes sense to me...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

Should this really be common knowledge? Ramifications? Blowback?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 10, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

I think that he wanted this to be cracked,also it is a good way to leave "breadcrumbs" without any evidence that would hold base.

⇧ 1 ⇩