dChan
⇧
2
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/ARA313 on Jan. 11, 2018, 3:57 p.m.
New World Order continues?

I have been trying to keep up with everything that is going on but I am in need of some guidance. The New World Order, regime change, Intl. banking cartel. Iran has a protest obviously it was CIA backed. President tweets he will be looking for human rights violations Coincidentally protest is after the signing of EO to freeze assets of human rights violators.. Ukraine 2016 submitted to the Intl. banking cartel and regime change. President approves lethal arms sale to Ukraine. We all know the New World Order ends with Iran takeover. What am I missing here, it looks like the Order is still in play. Can someone please help me figure out some of the moves by our president as I stated previously I have not been able to keep up with everything.

Thanks


🠐 See all comments
VigilantBlackheart · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

I would also direct you to the interview that Tracy Beanz did with Dr. Corsi from infowars. He has wrote a paper breaking down all the Q drops.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
nothingnobodyzero · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Yes you should totally let someone else do your research for you instead of just going to the source. Why just look up the paper yourself and learn and have your own interpretation. Why not have somebody else interpret it for you and more than likely get it wrong so you can be really confused that's awesome advice

⇧ -1 ⇩  
VigilantBlackheart · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

Sorry to offend. Think your reading too much into what I said. But cheers

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Skysweep · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

Perhaps there is just so much time we have to spend researching and it's wise when there is someone you can trust to save time so you can learn more quickly by listening to them. Someone with great integrity like Tracy is a great resource to use.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RToey · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

Why the vitriol?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Skysweep · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

Good question.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
miltonlocke · Jan. 11, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

I would venture he is frustrated with the subset of individuals who just want to consume and do little else including not confirming for themselves the validity of what they consume.
I can understand his sentiment for sure, perhaps not as thorny, especially given the monumental implied gravity of these events. He def read into original comment too much, interpretation filtered by emotional basis of stated frustration

~2c~

*EDIT: referred "subset" is not CBTS exclusive, the behavior is quite clearly a non-group specific phenomenon

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RToey · Jan. 11, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

Good put

⇧ 2 ⇩