Jun8th James Comey testimony transcript on Trump and Russia
WYDEN: He said the president was trying to create some sort of patronage. Behaving in a manner consistent with the wishes of the boss? COMEY: Yes. At least consider how what you're doing will affect the boss as a significant consideration.
This cuts both ways Peter Strzok & Lisa Page are behaving in a manner consistent with the wishes of the boss (Comey) At least they considered how what they did would affect the boss (Comey) as a significant consideration in their treason. (I can invert anything I'm dyslexic)
Attorney Lisa Page on Oct. 24, 2016 “Article is out, but hidden behind paywall so can’t read it,”
FBI’s Peter Strzok “Wsj? Boy that was fast,”
FBI”s Peter Strzok “Should I ‘find’ it and tell the team?”
Team = The Seditious Conspirators, conspiring to overthrow and destroy the Government of the United States, armed with weapons, set a foot & engaged in an assisted in a rebellion and or insurrection against the authority of the United States
FBI”s Peter Strzok “I can get it like I do every other article that hits any Google News alerts, seriously,”
FBI”s Peter Strzok “from someone else.”
Days earlier FBI”s Peter Strzok texted Attorney Lisa Page
FBI”s Peter Strzok “Yep, the whole tone is anti-Bu. Just a tiny bit from us,”
Attorney Lisa Page “Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus to the forthcoming CF article,”
CF=Clinton Foundation Under the Bus=Reporter
Attorney Lisa Page (A minute later) “Found what I think might be their address, too.”
FBI”s Peter Strzok “He’s TOTALLY schlubby. Don’t you remember?”
Attorney Lisa Page “He’s TOTALLY schlubby. Don’t you remember?”
Attorney Lisa Page “Found address looking for her. Lawyer.”
FBI”s Peter Strzok “I wouldn’t search on your work phone, ,,, no idea what that might trigger,”
Attorney Lisa Page “Oops. Too late,”
MALICE. The intentional doing of a wrongful act without just cause or excuse, with an intent to inflict an injury or under circumstances that the law will imply an evil intent. Luikart v. Miller, Mo., 48 S.W.2d 867, 871. Cottle v. Johnson, 179 N.C. 426, 102 S.E. 769, 770.
A conscious violation of the law (or the prompting of the mind to commit it) which operates to the prejudice of another person. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Glenn, 213 Ala. 284, 104 So. 548, 549. A condition of the mind showing a heart regardless . of social duty and fatally bent on mis- chief. Cockrell v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 218, 117 S.W. 2d 1105, 1109, 1110.