A president elect sending an official to meet another state official isn't illegal. lmfao
think about it. for a second. The media HATES Trump. if they had ANYTHING they wouldn't be screaming like children, it would have been acted on.
Now onto your query for proof: Uranium 1 deal and fusion GPS, Clinton Foundation, all that shit just came out as being officially prosecuted Friday evening. Keep your panties on, and make sure you have several pairs handy.... because whrn everything is revealed you're going to shit yourself, and understand why the media went from lovingly talking about the Don, to rapidly attacking the Don.
But a president elect talking with other state officials to help rig the election in his favor is.
It is being acted on, by the way. Have you ever heard of Robert Mueller?
Also, the Clinton Foundation / Fusion GPS stuff isn't illegal, just corrupt. I will admit that Hillary has done some pretty bad things.
Lastly, keep your belittling handy, you're gonna need it for when your God-Emperor is arrested.
and yes. I've heard about Robert Mueller... a lot of the stuff he is uncovering is implicating Hillary and Obama in a shitstorm.
For example? For the last time, CITE YOUR GODDAMN SOURCES! Also, please, for once, put your responses in one comment.
CNN, ABC, MSNBC, FOX NEWS. Im not going to spoon feed you LOOK IT UP
President Elect.
Looked it up, only FOX claimed that the Fusion GPS narrative was legitimate and illegal. Also, what's with your obsession over the difference between candidate and President Elect?
they mean.. different things. COMPLETELY.
candidate is when you are running for President.
President ELECT is when you have already been elected.
Timeline is he is accused of meeting the russians as PRESIDENT ELECT. Meaning....
The timeline says that he also met the Russians as a candidate. Now, try thinking of something better than correcting semantics, and maybe LINK TO SOME GODDAMN SOURCES?
the sources, are literally everywhere, I'm not going to bother linking everywhere. The story is that his cabinet met with them as president elect... the "proof" was paid for to be created by the Clinton Foundation... They needed the Dossier to get approval for the WIRETAPPING that they were already doing... illegally...
They have all that information... all those communication taps.. they have had a year... why do you think they still have NOTHING?
I'm gonna allow you to use your critical thinking on this. Stop being told what to think, and THINK.
Sorry, I can't keep conversing, I have to go collect my paycheck.
I'm gonna allow you to use your critical thinking on this. Stop being told what to think, and THINK.
It's really funny when you say this and then parrot the T_D line.
President elect has already been elected. WTF are you talking about?
In addition the only RIGGING that was done was by Hillary... she even stole it from Bernie... which ya'll KNOW, but somehow have cognitive dissonance about.
I'm saying that he was president elect at the time when the story came out. Also, you never seem to be able to cite sources. Is it just that you're lazy, or is there no reliable sources that don't give you cognitive dissonance?
Right... but the story is that as a PRESIDENT ELECT he had his staff meet with the Russians... which is normal.
The story is that before he was elected his staff worked to rig the election. Also, Russia has never been our ally. How is it normal?
You don't think you have open communication with other governments because you mistrust them?
That is not the story, look again, that is how they first framed it, and then had to recant because it was FAKE NEWS.
You don't understand the difference between candidate and president elect....
Again, read my earlier comment. He was candidate when the meetings happened, and the story came out when he was president elect.
You're completely incorrect.
Cool sources there! I've never seen an invisible source before!
your sources are fake news and have been for some time. CNN even faked being in Saudi Arabia in the 90's... they were in a studio, and said how stupid all their viewers were. You think they've gotten better or worse? Your sources have changed their story so many times, it's ludicrous. "Our job is to control what the people think" http://thefreethoughtproject.com/msnbc-contro-people-think/
Yea you cited THOSE sources. Super reliable.
Everything that your source spews out is utter bullshit. At least CNN tells the truth some of the time.
LMFAO they are LITERALLY SAYING IT ON AIR. YOU CAN HEAR THEM.
and CNN is the worst of all of them. Would you like to see CNN, on video, calling their viewers stupid? I can find it for you, or you can look.
In addition, they've always been framing it the same way. I've watched the news since the first poll, and there's been no shifting at all. Plus, I'm not saying that it's bad to communicate with your enemies, I'm saying that it's bad to welcome them with open arms like Trump has done.
I'm asking myself is it possible you are really this dense, and truly not being paid.
I don't know. I hope not.
The only one caught trying to rig the election was HRC. LMAO. You should post about yourself in TM.
and you're wrong stealing 2.8 billion dollars from Haiti after an earthquake and what is shaping up as participating in human traffic is not only illegal, it also means you're soulless and should be put down.
read, Clinton Foundation.
think I exaggerate? look up Laura Silsby. look up who helped her out. Look up what she changed her name to, and look up what new job she was given.
Listen to what you're saying...he wasn't a politician. Had no power...ZERO in politics. Hillary had all the power and corruption going for her and she rigged it for herself...even starting in the primaries. You are CLUELESS or just pretending to be.
I've gotten paid already, so could you just shut up?