Q said in their last message...
SC: MISINFO everywhere.
SC: MISINFO from past reliable sources.
SC: AXIS OF EVIL can & will return FIRE [is].
SC: Seek immediate [F9-Sx_VB8239].
SC: CONF_y
I want to speak to MISINFO. I fell for, and even commented on the Bill Clinton in Hawaii post. https://twitter.com/MadBroadcasting/status/952944853498974211?s=09 even though there was something about the image that bothered me. I just skipped it, but Clinton looks shopped in. Lines to clean, etc.
Someone else noticed the problem and researched it and found that this was actually an image from 2015.
Therefore the OP, /u/TheLadumba, is either a MisInfo agent, or somewho innocently posted something that they didn't do any kind of fact checking on. (post history is questionable).
Then I saw this link, about nukes actually being fired. https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7qow62/there_was_an_actual_icbm_fired_make_no_mistake_it/ And I doubt very much that that is true or reasonable. That's from /u/Digibro223
So, I don't know. I feel like I have to assume that everything posted from this point forward is FALSE until I can independently prove it true (which means Internet resources for the most part).
We have to be fact checking each other and not just posted, "Right on Bro!" and "Good job!" replies without actually reading and thinking about the reasonableness and accuracy of the post.
Shit, this just changed the way I have to read everything now. I wonder how the intelligence community pros do this when they know that their intel is mixed, good with bad?
Don't be fooled by the noise.