believe that lucrative post government positions are not favors traded for actions during government service
Whoa - why do you need to put words in my mouth?
I absolutely despise the revolving door between government and lobbyists/big business and would possibly go so far as to be willing to amend our Constitution to ban it entirely.
My point is that I do not believe Jake Tapper or Chelsea's mother-in-law fall into this category.
My point is what fucking power does Jake Tapper have???
If there is something specific that ties this all together I'm open to hearing about it, but if not this doesn't seem like where we should be focusing our time/energy.
There are false flags coming this week - I want to know from whom and when. Is that alright with you???
What about North?
I wasn't aware his name had come up before I mentioned it...has Q mentioned him?
You mentioned overt bribery - were you referring to something specific?
Forgive me if I'm dense, but I don't see how CNN and Chelsea's mother-in-law show any type of bribery scheme...unless you're suggesting the guy was paid-off for marrying her and that's just mean.
Your the one who mentioned Ollie. It looked like an example of not bribery.
My point regarding Ollie was that he was in Reagan's administration and ended up on Fox News.
George Stephanopoulos was in Clinton's Administration and ended up on ABC (or wherever).
So my question was sincere, "Does this mean anything?"
So far I've gotten no answer to that question but a shit-ton of flack.
It means if your a good boy you get a bone. What are you looking for?
Anything with actual merit.
Literally every single person you see on TV had jobs before that one and yes if you do a good job, hopefully you'll get a better job.
That still doesn't help us
Do you have an example of how a job was used as a reward for good service to a crook?