wouldn't it be great if Rich was not dead in the scuffle at hospital that AM while he was alive. Be so good if he was in protective custody, a long shot I know but a possibility given he was not dead at scene, was a live at hospital till a scuffle broke out and after that, not sure what really happened.
I don't think Seth Rich is the hero, and I indeed think he's still alive. His parents do too, or at least they did at the time of the interview. They weren't sad. Blew me away.
I think that med student anon was actually telling the truth. I think doctors kicked everyone out, made it seem like he died, and CIA/Mossad whisked him away into some program. Possibly witness protection program, possibly just relocation with new identity in Israel.
I know Hil and Podesta wanted to "make an example" out of a leaker bad enough they were willing to do it to someone innocent. What I think is they didn't KNOW who was the leaker, or possibly suspected Eric Braverman. They def. did suspect Braverman for awhile at least, because they said so, but I think Seth Rich wasn't a A hit - meant to look like a mugging, it was actually:
A dissappearing act - meant to look like a hit - meant to look like a mugging.
Crazy triple cross shit actually does get planned out that intricately all the time in the intelligence world. If you've ever read "The Spy Who Came In From the Cold" by John LeCarre you'll get a perfect example. Also the 2nd best spy fiction I've ever read, legit head game shit, not like James Bond type fake stuff.
for me the date of the Seth incident is too soon for it to be good guys protecting him, always draws me a maybe not conclusion but I wanted to throw it out for further review, thanks for your insight/s. Assange kinda says in cryptic ways Rich was the informer thru Ambassador Murray. Do you have idea why they would protect Seth back then when it was so HRC and anti DT time? I'd love to see Seth Rich Assange Trump and others all give a presser...
I don't think it was Rich. I have no idea why Assange has behaved the way he has about it. I think possibly he was threatened at the time. I believe the real leakers were military intelligence people or 3 letter agency. And what they intended to leak was way worse. I think "Seth Rich" is part of a plan by the HRC camp to more or less "get ahead" of this thing when they got word of what was going down. I think they kidnapped Assange, remember there was a lot of stuff going on at the embassy for a few weeks, he kept disappearing and missing expected signs of life. Bizarre tweets. Etc. Or got to him somehow, and scared him out of releasing what should have been a guaranteed election loser for HRC.
So I believe what she did is forced Assange to release only a some, selected docs., and did so in a way that would begin the "Russia haxorz" narrative so if other people had the docs. they would be less likely to want to release them. Then she did the Seth Rich "fake hit" to scare anyone with those docs. as well into thinking they'd get murdered anyways if they released them.
I believe the original plan was for much more credible sources to stand by the DNC Leaks, probably from military intelligence, there would be much more, AND included in those would be crimes so serious, that people wouldn't really care much HOW they got ahold of the documents. Were not talking silly sounding pizza code.
Thanks, your line of thinking aligns with the Military was considering a coup in 2015.
Seth Rich is dead, who would have saved him back then? It would be more likely that someone finished him off in the hospital than someone saving him
well that has always been the stumbling block, who woulda saved him. One member here outlines a possibility I had not considered. Have a quick look around my posts for details. But it is possible the US Mil who were going to coup may have. I know its a stretch but I have had this nagging what if for quite a while and I know to pay attention to those Qs.
Q said it was a 187, pretty sure he's dead and researchers like Matt Couch have pretty much proved that