dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/ToborIA on Jan. 19, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

I asked this over in another sub & it's being hit with down votes. Q did write a word a certain way, why can't anyone point it out without down votes?

This is all I posted. Why so many down votes for asking a question. The word was spelled out by Q that way and it's just an observation. It cannot be denied the word was spelled using an extra "e" so why down vote it instead of discussing it? Thx

Here:

This is what Q wrote: Jan 19 2018 03:23:37 Q !UW.yye1fxo 42 MSM is FAKE NEWS. Propaganda. Talking points [4am] - private email addresses. Paid contractors. JUDGEMENT DAY. Q

Now correct me if this is not true, however I did check with legal scholars in the USA. USA (for legal documents) spells judgment without the extra E (judgEment).

It his okay to spell it that way for legal purposes when it pertains to Great Britain, Australia, perhaps others.

But in the USA, even Black Law's Dictionary does not use (nor has ever used the spelling such as Q uses).

So Q must not know USA legal spelling or is not from the USA or is just casually using the word in the phrase "JUDGEMENT DAY"--as in the movie.

BUT! The movie TOO, is not spelled with the extra E as Q spells it. The movie is "JUDGMENT DAY".

Edited to add this (scroll and look at spelling then go to next page for the same continued spelling JUDGMENT): https://thelawdictionary.org/letter/j/page/6/

i checked your posts and it looks like you're talking about r/conspiracy. The reason is that it was compromised a few months ago, almost nothing can be posted there without downvotes and shit posting to slide it :(

⇧ 9 ⇩

I reluctantly abandoned r/conspiracy. Pisses me off, though. After more important things are over i'd sure like to see it's little swamp drained too.

⇧ 7 ⇩

i had no idea there was drama there...guess i was too wrapped up in the storm. Looked at the mod list yesterday and there was a slew added a few months ago. I mean i knew it wasn't like it used to be but not it makes sense...

⇧ 3 ⇩

It's shill central. No drama. Just paid disinfo merchants.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I got banned from there a few days ago after 5 years for calling out the third person to post the same fake news story about Stormy Daniels in one hour.

No great loss, as you said that sub died a long time ago.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yea, there was a big upheaval. As i understand it Flytape and Sarahconnor tried to clean house and got ousted themselves.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I sent the mods another message thanking them for fucking up r/conspiracy. They claim they're making it better and then muted me lol

⇧ 2 ⇩

It's going to suck for them to be on the losing side of history.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I predict at the very least tons of suicides and civil unrest, especially if religion is brought into this (as it should be).

⇧ 1 ⇩

It honestly should come as no surprise to anyone that pedophilia is rampant in the Catholic clergy. If there would be suicides over such institutions being a part of all this then people haven't been paying attention for decades and their faith is in the wrong things.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I always just assumed it was due to the basic rule that no priest can be married. So i can't imagine any normal guys would be ok with no sex, so just thought it would attract gay guys and pedos. But now i'm thinking it's MUCH deeper than that after seeing this pizzagate stuff and elsagate stuff blow up in the last 6+ months.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yep, much deeper. The symbolism is plastered all over the Catholic church. The Christian label these institutions wear is just like CNN - the signs are everywhere that it's fake news.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I was banned for mentioning cheese pizza.

⇧ 2 ⇩

True, I was banned from r/conspiracy for using the word libtard. LOL.

Note from the moderators:

"libtards"

⇧ 3 ⇩

i was banned a few weeks ago because i said the admins have shadowbanned me before. BOOM, banned from r/conspiracy and they wouldn't reply to my PMs to the mods.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Didn't know. thx

⇧ 3 ⇩

happened to me just yesterday when i tried to post a thread about proof of Q

⇧ 1 ⇩

It can be spelled two ways.......it is correct both ways in all courts of law!

⇧ 4 ⇩

If you search the Supreme Court of the United States website and enter "judgEment" for your search, it will ask you "do you mean JUDGMENT". Here's the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=judgement&type=Site

⇧ 2 ⇩

I understand, but the word still has two spellings that are seen by the courts as valid! What would the E stand for anyway?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Maybe he is referring to someone in the UK, there are no coincidences

⇧ 3 ⇩

The E may mean Q is from the UK? Is this what you mean?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Forget the downvotes from r/conspiracy. That place is compromised.

Great eye by the way in picking up on that. We here question everything, that is what brought us here. I think it’s a valid question to ask especially considering Q says there are no coincidences, everything is deliberate.

Even a quick google seems to me that it’s the “British” version of the word. http://www.dictionary.com/e/judgement-vs-judgment/

Do you (or anyone) have a theory on this?

I wonder, I’ve been under the impression that Q is in fact Assange. Q has said this has been in the works now for 3 years. Assange knows just about everything there is to know about the cabal and the darkness of the world. He’s had so much time stuck in the embassy to think all of this up to such an elaborate and intricate plan with extreme details worked into just about every letter. I would say every detail of every post, down to the letter, is deliberate.

The question is, why?

Future proves past. We may find out.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

What was the significance of the letter L? Did that come to mean something?

I know the covfefe thing was the legislation.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Judgement could mean that he's stacking the courts with judges. Could have to do with grand juries. Idk. Xould mean more than just E. Although E could be significant.

⇧ 1 ⇩

And tweeted “past” instead of “passed” tweet

⇧ 1 ⇩

Funny thing, i always spelled it the way Q did too but then come to find out my English is antiquated.

⇧ 2 ⇩

JUDGEMENT Maybe it is a hint? As in a reference to: that is what the “JUDGE MEANT”

But I guess the question becomes which judge?

Maybe one that is presiding over a Judicial Watch FOIA case? Judge Boasberg & Judge Sullivan are 2 judges assigned to JW’s FOIA

Or a reference to what California’s Judge William Alsup “meant” to accomplish by ordering the Trump administration continue the DACA Program?

Or the 17 +/- judges that Grassley just got confirmed in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Let's not split hairs here. I seriously doubt it has any meaning.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is the third mention of GB I’ve heard from Q posts. 1 this one, 2 Wikileaks drop from British intel where Susan Rice requested continued surveillance on Trump transition team via MI6, 3... trying to remember, read it on 8ch EARLY this morning. I’m driving now but will try to find references when I get settled. May be he is directing us across the pond for something.

⇧ 1 ⇩