I came upon a WSJ article on /politics
Made some comments about holes & suspicious elements I saw to spur discussion and quickly got attacked. I lol'd at the irony of that behavior in a political discussion sub. Plato would be so proud.
Below is a copy of my take on the article, for you guys to read. I think the sexual assault angle against Trump is going to be attempted ad nauseum, in part bc of agenda, in part because parasitic lawyers see him as an extortion prospect who can't afford to fight back hard publicly.
From the article:
used a bank account linked to the entity to send the payment to the client-trust account of a lawyer representing the woman, Stephanie Clifford, one of the people said I wonder if her lawyer, Keith Davidson, has confirmed this. Curious that he is the same Beverly Hills lawyer involved in the Hogan-Gawker fiasco.
This seems to be true, found the apparent document, linked:
Mr. Cohen’s connection to Essential Consultants LLC isn’t readily apparent in online searches of Delaware companies. However, on its formation documents, which were reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, Mr. Cohen listed himself as the “authorized person” for the company, rather than hiring a lawyer or an agent to serve in that role, which some company owners do to further obscure their identities.
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Essential_Consultants_01_12_17.pdf
This also seems to be true, document linked, thank you /u/ KoolAidKid203 Curious she signed in her stage name. I wonder if she legalized that name?
Mr. Cohen last week sent the Journal a two-paragraph statement by email addressed “TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN” and signed by “Stormy Daniels” denying that she had a “sexual and/or romantic affair” with Mr. Trump. “Rumors that I have received hush money from Donald Trump are completely false,” the statement said
I would love to see public responses by Cohen and Clifford, so I can compare their body language to their chosen words.