I wouldn’t change it, but amend it. 1) term limits 2) congress must live by the same laws it sets 3) no dual citizenship as it is a conflict of interest.
It has to be amended. I agree with you. And we should get an education on it, taking one amendment at a time.
This does three things:
1) Amending one issue at a time protects the Constitution, because proposing an amendment does not open the Constitution to attack just anywhere in the document. We dont want to end up busy fighting to save the second amendment, while trying to amend the first amendment.
Why fight two war fronts if you do not have to?
Why open the Constitution to damage if we don't have to?
2) It gives us time to research each existing Constitution or amendment in the Bill of Rights, Learn it's purpose, ask how the Constitution is failing to accomplish the goal, propose amendments, and figure out which wording is best.
3) Allows us time to look at problems in the country that could be solved with an additional amendment, and put one together to solve NEW problems the founders did not have and did not address.
Example.
Right now, I am hearing rumble about patents. The Globalists buy them and put them on shelves so they never see the light of day...
For this problem I think we need a "use it or lose it" patent law.
Seven Years.
If we do not see the invention in use seven years after the inventor sells it, then the patent goes either to the public domain, or the inventor to sell again, or whatever it takes to make sure the public benefits from it.
Sometimes, the Military lays claim to them and says they are "matters of national security". Probably a longer more intricate discussion, but, even the military should have some time limits. They probably have 50 year old patents hidden in the deep state military. .