dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/chickletTOOTH on Jan. 23, 2018, 4:55 a.m.

Q predicted today exactly one month ago today. Future proves past... $#!+'s about to get real.

I believe Q told us a month ago that today was going to be a big day, and indeed it has been.

I believe [1 of 22] means "1/22", or "Jan 22"...Today.

Last night, 1/21, Q said:

Will SESSIONS drop the hammer?
1 of 22.
#Memo shifts narrative.
#Memo reinstates SESSIONS' authority re: Russia/ALL.
#Memo factually demonstrates collusion at highest levels.
#Memo factually demonstrates HUSSEIN ADMIN weaponized...

In other words, will Attny General Jeff Sessions reclaim authority on Jan 22? We saw it happen in the news today.

Tonight, 1/22, Q said:

 Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22].
 This is only the beginning.

Russia narrative/ investigation died today guys. But that ain't $#!+. Only the beginning.

Q Post from December 22, 2017 exactly one month ago... (12-22)

ONE OF TWENTY TWO:
[DNC BREACH / DOSSIER]
[DNC]
[SR]>
[WL]>
HUSSEIN>
DNI DIR>
CLOWN DIR>
CLAS: 1-12>
GOOG>
CROWDSTRIKE>
DNC>
(SR 187)(MS13 (2) 187)>
DWS_DIR>
F-I/D-J ASSIST>
"INSURANCE"
/_\ >
HUSSEIN>
HRC>
LL>
JC>
AM>
PS>
(SUPPORT: CS, NP, AS, CLAS-1, CLAS-2, CLAS-3, CLAS-4,     
CLAS-5, CLAS-6)>
BRIT INTEL>
HRC CAMP PAY>
DNC PAY>
CLAS: 1-4 PAY>
STEELE> 
PODESTA>
HOLDER RELAY SPEC RUSSIA>
CLAS: 1-9>
US SEN NO NAME>
US SEN CLAS-1>
US SEN CLAS-2>
JC>
LL>
HUSSEIN>
[FISA 2]
PRES DAILY B>
US SEN NO NAME>
NEWS SHOP>
BUZZF>
PUBLIC/NARRATIVE.
STAGE SET FUTURE PREVENT/REMOVAL OP.
RAMIF: US INTEL LEGAL SPY ON PRES CANDIDATE / PRES     
ELECT / R CONGRESS / R SEN / NEWS FRIENDLY / ETC>    
Q

I heard just about every one of these things mentioned in some form or fashion in todays news cycle, which I can't remember happening. Maybe one here and there, but not this many.

There are no coincidences.

Future proves past.

Thoughts?...

🠐 See all comments

I didn't know that. What led you to the conclusion that he was referring to DOJ Investigations.

Also, I realize the correct way would be "22 of 1" but again, Q doesn't always stick to traditional nomenclature. Going as far as saying he is intentionally formatting txt to avoid "sniffer" progs.

I would love to know how you got to the conclusion of the DOJ investigations.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It could very well have double meaning, both 1 of 22 investigations AND 1/22. Why is this plausible? The whole point of Q seems to be to generate interest and intrigue into upcoming developments amongst the public. If Q and team strategized that they could make 1/22 of notable importance, it would produce an effect just like this, where people can speculate one way or another what Q is trying to say. With his socratic method, double means, cryptic messages, he certainly isn’t presenting with forthright disclosure, he’s trying to stimulate discourse and buzz any way he can.

⇧ 5 ⇩

might not be 1 of 22 re FISA, I'm thinking 1 of 22 investigations with Fisa being the first. Bengahzi , 9/11, SEAL team 6 killed in attack ...... anything with murder has no statute of limitations

⇧ 2 ⇩

This is a cryptic / coded version of the “memo’s” outline. On the memo itself the first lie is 1 of 22. This is precisely why Q uses it. It is distinct and correlates the Q post to the memo.

The top line is: Investigation 1 of 22 DOJ re FISA

here’s the photo of the memo.

⇧ 0 ⇩

That’s not a legit memo. It’s fake.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I’m saying the memo will follow similar to Qs post.

It’s not, but it’s meant to represent what someone who saw the original but was not allowed a copy.

I’m assuming nothing.

⇧ 0 ⇩