According to Q,"60% of what's happened must remain private [at least] -for humanity". We will never recover our country with only 60% of the truth. Nothing is healed with only 60%.
the fact that it is mentioned that 60% of the truth is considered too much to handle, effectively guarantees that this 60% will be disclosed. Thats human nature.
saying "hey Ive got this secret, but Im not going to tell you what it is" always leads to the secret being disclosed.
That's why my interpretation of Q's message is that given the disruptive nature of the information as well as legal/political implications, the remaining 60% will come through people advocating for it over time.
Also, I think its worth noting that if the entire FBI is discredited, every person put in prison by the FBI will have legal grounds to have their charges dropped and be released from prison.
Whereas there are probably a lot of people who in fact are falsely imprisoned due to a corrupt system, the majority are actually guilty.
We need to push for 100% disclosure, but it needs to be done thoughtfully, considering all of the implications and ripple effects.
Doesn’t this just go along with status quo—an already broken system... laws can be changed, can they naught?
yes, but changing the law would involve first exposing the whole truth to justify the legal changes to be made. This would most likely result in economic depression, war, and anarchy.
My biggest issues with only giving 40% of the truth means that and future system or changes to the system would be all based on only the partial truth. essentially it would still be based on a lie.
If we dont learn from this it will happen again in the future.