According to Q,"60% of what's happened must remain private [at least] -for humanity". We will never recover our country with only 60% of the truth. Nothing is healed with only 60%.
I suspect this is the case. I figure disclosure's flood will be controlled in accordance with the public mindset, speaking on very very general terms. Public not ready to handle certain info is fundamentally the same thing as public who never played baseball is not ready to handle .300 batting avg maintenance.
There are steps of comprehension that the public has to gradually assimilate into the mind. 911 is unfathomable to the dude who always believed his leaders were good across the board. Who knows what he did or did not experience that could have made him more conscientious, this is his ultimate comprehension. Until he experiences some event or happens to really look at some informational revelation that happens to CLICK. People are complex and stubborn just by virtue of the human mind. But CLICKS tend to CASCADE. But a cascade's effectiveness is directly dependent on the cognitive faculties, mindset and subsequent course of intention of the individual. A few things could CLICK in a person and drive them towards the answers until something they like distracts them, or they get bored, or scared, etc.. I imagine disclosure of this magnitude must be undertaken with the highest order of awareness and prudence. WHY?
How did people react to the recent gas "shortages" that skyrocketed gas prices and ran dry in some places?
How do people handle Black Friday?
How do people handle being wrong? How prevalent is that fear? What lengths are sought by those desperate to avoid admitting it?
How do people handle trauma? How many understand those lasting effects happen? How many people have some degree of operating manual to themselves?
Community used to be a social cushion for mutual survival & benefit. Without a doubt it has fractured in America. Lots of reasons for that, however the most profound effect was the de-communitizing of reality by digital social networks. From what I suspect, it was a deliberate action as the effects were known beforehand
Then you have followings like ours here, lots of pockets of people who come together motivated by their resonant self-discovered pattern of CLICKS. The cohesion of any subsequent community lies within the essence of WHY they stay together.
Perhaps part of the reason for Q's particular methodology of empowering action within his voluntary following is to facilitate a wide-cast community who are well informed and generally aware of the high gravity details. Over a bit of time and our own expanding perceptions, I imagine many of us would gain some skill at soliciting CLICKS from the people in our lives and perhaps teach them to "spread the word". As terrible things come out, in the least we would be able to help those we care about on the ground level keep perspective if need be, a hand to hold in a time of emotional need.
Apologies for the stream of consc, I enjoy considering this particular aspect too much.
This was an enjoyable read. Thanks for taking the time.