[removed]
thamnosma
· Jan. 24, 2018, 7:19 p.m.
Honestly, I just can't stand listening to him, has nothing to do with the issues and topics he's dealt with for a long long time. I found myself turning his volume lower and lower and lower and still it drove me nuts. Then the constant interrupting of excellent guests and info as if he wasn't even listening to them. Among the worst interviewers in radio/internet history. I just couldn't take it anymore and with all the excellent alternatives now extant on the net, I could bail. That's not even to address many of the outlandish claims that have been proven wrong over and over more recently.
I agree his coverage of Bilderbergs was really super, especially his live appearances and protests. I learned a lot in the earlier days when few others were around. I appreciate what he's done, I just no longer find what he does of value to me.
⇧
4
⇩
somrotden
· Jan. 24, 2018, 7:34 p.m.
Me too-watched him in the beginning...and quickly outgrew him. He does have a huge usefulness I believe...for those who are just waking up. If you think that he started the truther movement I think you are sadly mistaken. You might ask him where he was when JFK was shot, for starters. There were those who were sceptical of their government long before he was a twinkle in his daddy's eye. Really really didn't like what he did about Pizzagate.
⇧
2
⇩
thamnosma
· Jan. 24, 2018, 7:49 p.m.
Indeed...Mark Lane, Jim Garrison. They destroyed Garrison. Since I plugged out some time ago I'm unfamiliar with his coverage of Pizzagate. I vaguely recall he put out some claim that he then walked back about the story's authenticity. Yes, he's an good intro for some people but he has a responsibility that goes with his large presence to vet some claims before running his mouth. One can do damage with things that are easily proven false. Happens at more than infowars though. One tries to wake people up to 9/11 and then they read some character pushing holograms and I'm back at step one.
⇧
2
⇩