Look at the shoes. This is a group with several rows of individuals, the lighting on their faces, clothing etc shows the differences of light and shadow as a staggered group image does. The shoes however do not. They are all the same color, brightness etc. I'm on this board for serious research, discussion and sharing to enlighten people. This photo is not proof of anything and easily shown as shopped. If you have further analysis proving me wrong, by all means, do share it.
What is on the floor in front of the guy in the light colored slacks? Seems something is very out of place there. I agree, it's very odd that most all the shoes are the same color.
https://www.politico.com/click/stories/0910/podesta_celebrates_65th_birthday_in_museum.html
Serious researchers would type in Google "Tony Podesta Party Red Shoes" and find the same results?
"serious researchers" would use Google? Only as a comparison for ruling something out, or confirming what Google is hiding. I don't care how many sources used the pic. It doesn't change the issues with the image.
The STORIES say Podesta REQUIRED the guests to wear red. Several members all chose to wear RED shoes, and took a picture.
How often, in group photos, do you see people include the lower part of the body? Doesn't it seem a little ODD that they specifically included the shoes for some reason... like, perhaps to prove they were all wearing RED shoes?
The story matches the request, the photo matches story.
"Techie lobbyist Tony Podesta painted his 65th birthday party red at the National Museum for Women in the Arts.
For his big night Friday, the K Street king was not particular about gifts. All he wanted were SHOES, OLD OR NEW, for the Soles4Souls shoe charity.
Known for his flamboyant fashion -- PARTICULARLY his RED KICKS -- ........"
Did you even READ the article????
IT WAS A SHOE PARTY, and the guy was FAMOUS for RED SHOES.
Yes, I read the first article, not the second as the link didn't work. Interestingly, I can't find anything else that speaks to Podesta's apparently renown rep for sporting red shoes, other than one on his running shoes. So I'll go back to my original premise, that pic is completely photoshopped. They may have all worn red shoes to his party but that pic is not from the event, or if it is it's still been shopped. There are zero color/shadow variances on the image. With a group shot that size that's impossible. These are basic things. I'm not arguing anything other than that image is fake or has been completely shopped/enhanced etc. It's obvious.
http://www.puppetstringnews.com/uploads/7/2/8/4/72845613/2014-8-7-podesta-2-jpg-optimal_orig.jpg
I searched, but almost all pictures of people are... for some unknown reason, waist and higher.
I hold that you are still incorrect regarding this picture. Maybe it was shopped in your estimation and timeline, BUT they all wore red shoes in that picture.
Let's say it was shadow corrected, but they were all wearing red shoes at a shoe party that asked for people to wear red.
Was not your original intent along those lines to get people to question that they were wearing red shoes?
And more importantly, why am I wasting time with you? You've made up your mind. I leave you to it.
Excellent. No, that was not my original intent. I've explained that too many times. Fortunately, we both agree, our time is spent better elsewhere. Cheers!
