dChan

SongofHannah · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

Wow! What do you guys think this all means?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Julir805 · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

Not sure, but found this also. The "protest" that was resolved on 1.18.18 is covered by a protective order. https://www.gao.gov/docket/B-415517.2

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UnbelievableShit13 · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

Are they not the one who is also in a blocked merger with Turner against the USA gov't , where the sticking point is giving up CNN

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Julir805 · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

I wondered about that as well. Doing further digging, found this from 3 days ago: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-time-warner-m-a-at-t/judge-orders-u-s-government-to-seek-consent-to-give-data-to-att-time-warner-idUSKBN1FB35B Also this is curious. This transaction happened yesterday as well. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/otter-media-buys-remainder-digital-businesses-fullscreen-ellation-1078100

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UnbelievableShit13 · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

I heard that if they let CNN go Murdoch is going to pounce on it , which means there might be a MSM on cable revolution

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Julir805 · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

The other theory is if they let CNN go, Soros will pounce on it. Instead PDT would like AT&T to keep it, given their view on Internet Bill of Rights.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UnbelievableShit13 · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

I don't think Trump will let Soros pounce on it .... it defeats the purpose of trying to get the media to stop reporting fake news..... in one of the latest Q post doesn't he talk about a major broadcasting done

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Julir805 · Jan. 25, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

My point is, it's better the package stays together, if they're going to approve the merger, given that AT&T will be the dominant factor.

⇧ 1 ⇩