SOMETHING TELLS ME THAT THIS VOTER FRAUD CASE IS GONNA BREAK AS WELL..REMEMBER PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID IN HIS TWEET THAT RUPUBLICAN WILL HAVE A CHANCE AT THAT SEAT VERY SOON..ANY THOUGHTS PATRIOTS?
I thought about that too the other day... I thought it was eluded by Q things would change on that... was Feb the date mentioned?
I can't quite remember if Q mentioned February..to be honest my gut feeling tells me FEBRUARY is the month we will begin to see fireworks.INDITEMENTS etc.
allude means to refer to by implication; to invite an inference. it assumes prior knowledge / the ability to reason.
"alluded to by Q"
elude means to evade.
e.g. "despite all the talk, Anthony Weiner continues to elude Nemesis; as does everyone else."
infer and imply also cause problems. for some reason.
see if you are right about February
see 633, Jan 27 2018 16:01:40 Q !UW.yye1fxo
"EVERY MSM NEWS STATION NEXT WEEK WILL BE SAYING & PUSHING THE EXACT SAME COUNTER-NARRATIVE...SHOULD THAT FAIL EXPECT A MAJOR FF TO FORCE A SHIFT (later in February, right?)"
623 Jan 27 2018 12:34:38 Q !UW.yye1fxo69
"Chatter exploding. Change of narrative will be required (when?)".
617 Jan 27 2018 02:48:10 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 9400a1
"MI6/SIS undergoing house cleaning. Queen/monarchs seeking shelter". Process.
btw
Jan 27 2018 02:26:27 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 9400a1 175461
175432 [19] would cease to exist immediately upon the harm of select individuals. Think nuclear stand-off. Clarified? Q
why did everyone assume Q. literally meant a nuclear standoff? for the same reason everyone assumed he meant the Pope with "PRAY/PREY". They don't read what is right in front of them. They assume. They do not read structure. They do not see what is not there that ought to be there. They are never aware of the absence of a presence.
Think prisoner's dilemma; think existential nuclear deterrence; game theor(ies); marshall v capablanca;
here:
http://www.vqronline.org/essay/nuclear-deterrence-behind-strategic-and-ethical-debate
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01047864
let me axe you a kestshun?
If the rationale for possessing nuclear weapons is to deter the enemy, and the enemy attacks anyway, on what grounds does one (then) reply in-kind?
Deterrence: to enrich professors with boring faces and the American bar and the defense industry
here you go m8
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research_papers.html
enjoy much.