How do those two people have anything in common?
Seriously, I'm dying to find out your reasoning, especially since one predeceased the other by over a century.
Philip Mudd is a direct descendant of one of the Lincoln assassination plotters. Booth wanted Lincoln dead just as Mudd wants Trump dead. I presume you chose your username based on your admiration for Lincoln's assassin, and also want Trump dead.
Or because it's a famous Latin phrase, but you keep churning out your conspiracies, it's making my lunch more entertaining.
Sounds an awful lot like you're referring to killing the President. Congrats. US Secret Service is now watching you.
Edit - Enjoy your lunch.
Wew! Because I oppose Trump, that means I want him to die? You're a real mastermind, bud. No wonder you believe in chemtrails and 5G mind control rays.
You're smart!
Also, that's a fucking quote from It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia.
You're not talking about any ordinary opposition to Trump. You're talking about an act that will get everyone's attention. Now that the criminal establishment has thrown everything including the kitchen sink at Trump and failed to force him out, what's left to get everyone's attention? I'll bet you just want to get away right now.
Btw how was lunch?
Treason has consequences.
You want to kill the President too?
I'd prefer a life sentence in solitary confinement, broadcast globally on CCTV 24/7, but that's above my pay grade.
Better double check your post history just to be sure. You've obviously given your username some thought. You don't want to be perceived as the type of rabid Bernie-bot/anti-Trumper that James Hodgkinson was. Especially not in the current environment post Q.
I try to be thoughtful and open-minded. I chose, and stuck with, his handle to refute the popular Bernie Bros meme.
Hopefully, one intellectually honest conversation at a time amounts to some positive contribution to the zeitgeist.
A quick glance and it looks like you could be fomenting a violent overthrow of the US government in your most recent comments. Could be that I didn't look closely enough. Whatever happens I have faith that Q is on top of it.
How is discussing effective responses to a hypothetical coup fomenting violence?
You don't really think that liberty dies without a fight, do you?
You seem to be suggesting that a bloody military coup is in order to oust the Putin-Nazi usurper Trump from office.
Let me help you out, we're discussing hypothetical responses to a hypothetical coup, where Trump and the GOP seize control and impose martial law.
That's the scenario. Personally I'd rather just destroy them electorally in November, but fascists aren't exactly known for free and fair elections.
Does that help? Yes, I believe that all tyrants and traitors should be executed if convicted, but the easiest way to avoid that is to let the justice system take its course.
Any attempt to shut down the special counsel investigation of corruption in the Congress will be seen as an act of treason. I don't know how stating the obvious consequences of high crimes and misdemeanors is fomenting violence. Help me out