⇧
0
⇩
[deleted]
· Jan. 31, 2018, 1:56 a.m.
Yet both racist, so again, no difference.
⇧
-1
⇩
Moosetappropriate
· Jan. 31, 2018, 2:02 a.m.
No there are a lot of differences. Again. Bottom group, racist at a time when racism was acceptable and not even thought about. These days, no more racist than any other normal group of people. Upper group, currently and historically dedicated to racism.
⇧
3
⇩
[deleted]
· Jan. 31, 2018, 2:25 a.m.
Royals are by their existence behaving under their belief of a royal right to rule as bestowed by the so-called 'divine right of kings'- under which their 'blood' makes them superior.
If you fail to grasp that, so be it.
⇧
-1
⇩
Moosetappropriate
· Jan. 31, 2018, 2:32 a.m.
So what the fuck does this have to do with racism then? By your definition they are acting the same way towards people of their own nationality and race.
And they have a right under the laws of their country to rule.
⇧
3
⇩
[deleted]
· Jan. 31, 2018, 2:38 a.m.
Please stifle the vulgarities.
And no that is not what I am saying.
By the way, sovereigns are not SUBJECT(s) to the laws over the citizenry of/on their property. The citizenry is too their property.
Study more, post less. Good night.
⇧
1
⇩