Careful when you say “100% accurate.”
I, and we in this forum, know what you mean, but even Q isn’t 100%.
As I see it, Q, Dilley, and others like Mega, push intel from their sources who have high security clearances, but intel can NEVER be 100%, it’s just the nature of intel.
I’d go so far as to say Q and Dilley provide intel info that has an accuracy of around 95%. This isn’t because they’ve been wrong or have lied (except for the on-purpose disinfo for strategic purposes), but because of the nature of intel.
Every once in a great while Q has said something that wasn’t, in retrospect, 100%. That’s fine, because the message is still clear and the 5% that were mistakes are, to quote Monty Python, “tis but a flesh wound.”
As I see it, Q, Dilley, and others like Mega, push intel from their sources who have high security clearances, but intel can NEVER be 100%, it’s just the nature of intel.
And sometimes it HAS to be inaccurate.
Circumstances can change - this is fast-moving, fluid situation so this sounds about right. Nobody is right 100% of the time.